Epstein / Prince Andrew / Maxwell

[Mon Autre]

So why didn't she take it to court?

Probably didn't want to end up the same way that Epstein did.

 

[bluemanc16]

As well as what he's giving her. The 'its all for charity' angle is good pr and damage limitation for both of them.

As well as what he's giving her. The 'its all for charity' angle is good pr and damage limitation for both of them.

damage limitation for him, you are joking, his reputation his shot, paying someone a substantial amount to someone he has never met ?

 

[KS55]

BBC confirmed she has got a big wedge out of him

That's what got him into trouble in the first place

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

He is the hedonist's hedonist, freeloader's freeloader, and thorough arsehole of a human being!

 

[hampshireblue]

That's what got him into trouble in the first place

But this one she actually wanted. I hear he's now got a Pizza Express card to give him discounts as that's all he can afford after this.

 

[bakerdave76]

The scene in a future series of The Crown where Andrew asks his mum for the money to pay off Virginia Giuffre.

 

[lonestay]

Expect he will be celebrating with a pizza this evening .

 

[mackenzie]

BBC confirmed she has got a big wedge out of him and her charity gets some too.

Being "forced to settle" admits nothing. It can also be perceived as the plaintiff conceding.

BBC confirmed she has got a big wedge out of him and her charity gets some too.

95% of yank cases are settled before court , it is not a criminal case , she has forced him to settle therefore admitting he is in the wrong and he has had to give her probably several million to her charity , he knew he had no leg to stand on at a trial

It "admits" nothing of the sort. That's the whole point of a settlement.

 

[Keep the Faith]

If he was not guilty and felt he could prove it, why didn't he get his legal team to get her to withdraw her accusations against him, when issuing a joint statement
He obviously didn't and that says to me GUILTY by default

 

[ancoats]

By giving her charity millions

so if your a multi billionaire its ok to do whatever you like because you can pay your way out of trouble ?
like i said this is sending out the wrong message to the victims and for them to come forward.
today she has let down and the charity by taking the money ? its now ok to pay your way out of trouble

you might as well close the charity down because its saying ITS OK to be a victim here is your pay out ?
why settle out of court ? i don't under stand it. the whole case was about making stand against the crime
bringing justice to the victims and having the accused found guilty