ChicagoBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 18,326
Erling Haaland likes this post.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Erling Haaland
- Thread starter JOGAMIGMOG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Otamendi's Beard
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Jul 2007
- Messages
- 3,931
Exceptional.Heather Thomas you say ..View attachment 34278
Which isnt much when Kane at 125m would have cost us the same. Grealish costs us right now £35m a year.Only £45mill a season :)
Like break it down
£125m fee / 5 years = £25m
£400k wages = £20.8m a year
Kanes per year cost = £46.8m
----------------
I expect City to sign Haalnd for 6 years.
Haaland = £64m + £40m in fees / 6 = £17.3m
Haaland Wages 500k = £26m a year
Haaland per year cost = £43.3
Then you look at the age. Haaland 4 years in will be 25 years old costing us £43.3m a year. Kane would be 33 years old costing us £46.8m a year. I definitely know who id rather be dumping all that money into. Not to mention If Haaland signed a new deal half way through those fees get further spread out. City might only amortise the transfer fee too and put the signing on bonuses in a yearly hit.
£125m fee / 5 years = £25m
£400k wages = £20.8m a year
Kanes per year cost = £46.8m
----------------
I expect City to sign Haalnd for 6 years.
Haaland = £64m + £40m in fees / 6 = £17.3m
Haaland Wages 500k = £26m a year
Haaland per year cost = £43.3
Then you look at the age. Haaland 4 years in will be 25 years old costing us £43.3m a year. Kane would be 33 years old costing us £46.8m a year. I definitely know who id rather be dumping all that money into. Not to mention If Haaland signed a new deal half way through those fees get further spread out. City might only amortise the transfer fee too and put the signing on bonuses in a yearly hit.
Gaz (FMwkdsoul)
Well-Known Member
Why is Haaland on a six? 5 is the longest we’ve handed out in one contract
diamond geezer
Well-Known Member
He doesn't want his per year cost to be expresible with a finite number of decimalsWhy is Haaland on a six? 5 is the longest we’ve handed out in one contract
Gordyola
Well-Known Member
Plenty of 6 Year contracts The longer the contract the smaller the amortisation is per year https://www.spotrac.com/epl/manchester-city-fc/contracts/Why is Haaland on a six? 5 is the longest we’ve handed out in one contract
DONG!!!!!Heather Thomas you say ..View attachment 34278
MichaelFrontzeck'sBathroom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Jul 2014
- Messages
- 3,484
- Team supported
- Manchester City F.C.
They may as well have just said he’s off to Madrid.Very sceptical about anyone on sky saying we're in pole position. Those supposed two transfer experts on there have some absolutely shit sources. Should find out in the next few weeks what his future plans are anyway, well so sky says anyway
Gaz (FMwkdsoul)
Well-Known Member
Forgot jack was 6 from the off, the rest were all 5 then extensions. Fair enough.Plenty of 6 Year contracts The longer the contract the smaller the amortisation is per year https://www.spotrac.com/epl/manchester-city-fc/contracts/
- Status
- Not open for further replies.