Erling Haaland

[SWP's back]

Everyone was shitting it when Werner signed for Chelsea…

And they won the CL and knocked us out of the FA Cup....

 

[Legal Alien]

Everyone was shitting it when Werner signed for Chelsea…

Yeah and maybe seeing Werner struggle scared City off??

I would luv Haaland, but i do think Kane suits our game better and he has proved that he can score consistently in the PL.

 

[Deleted member 87819]

And they won the CL and knocked us out of the FA Cup....

There was no one worried about Werner last summer. But Pep wanted him.
I still think he’s being underestimated and next season could be big for him. He is a solid player and the right coach (not Lampard) could get the best from him.

 

[Maly]

Afraid he’s off to Liverpool lads & lasses.

 

[wolviedinho]

A bit like the centre half situation last summer, no Koulibaly oh no probs let's get Kounde then, shit third choice Dias it is then, thank god.
But this third choice option of Ings would be a real pisser if it happened, lol

Can we rename ings once he signs?

How about:

Danny Kane or Danny Haaland;)

 

[I'm Blue]

Afraid he’s off to Liverpool lads & lasses.

Mbappe threads that way

 

[simon23]

Imho it's a big mistake prioritizing kane over haaland....if we are

Kane for me doesnt win you the big big games...he is decent against most of the prem but we don't need that...we need a game changer and kane isnt that against the likes of the red scouse, utd, chelsea and the big European teams

 

[wagonman]

If our management team doesn't buck up its ideas we might be too late to sign Benteke...

JJ

 

[bobmcfc]

If Dortmund have slapped a Eur 200 million selling price on the lad then we should definitely look elsewhere. There are plenty of strikers available for £50 million maximum.

Lol

 

[Deleted member 87819]

Imho it's a big mistake prioritizing kane over haaland....if we are

Kane for me doesnt win you the big big games...he is decent against most of the prem but we don't need that...we need a game changer and kane isnt that against the likes of the red scouse, utd, chelsea and the big European teams

We don’t know who we are prioritizing. People who claim themselves to be ITK (I am not talking about Tolmie btw) here and were saying not long ago that Haaland was going to be our player 100% now quickly switched to Kane 100%. And are using points like saying reliable journalists claim he is the main target — no, the most reliable journalists were and are saying Kane is the backup.
Like I said in the past, having everyone believe we have a convincing second option lined up is the way to make this work for all sides. And that means even the ITK’s who “heard from somebody who knows something” have to buy it.
However, if Chelsea closes the deal with Haaland or is more consistently linked with him, it would make our “back up” even harder to close

 

[I'm Blue]

If our management team doesn't buck up its ideas we might be too late to sign Benteke...

JJ

He’s won a league, more than Kane : )

 

[argyle]

As soon as they won the Champions League I said it would be obvious that Abramovich sanctions a big transfer splurge.

Just like they did the last time they won it with Hazard.

They are bold/crazy enough to pay huge money for one player. City won't do that.

 

[Dr Jacoby]

And they won the CL and knocked us out of the FA Cup....

….and scraped fourth place after Leicester metaphorically castrated themselves

 

[razman]

As soon as they won the Champions League I said it would be obvious that Abramovich sanctions a big transfer splurge.

Just like they did the last time they won it with Hazard.

They are bold/crazy enough to pay huge money for one player. City won't do that.

Ya, I remember when hazard signed right after they won the ucl

Pain

 

[Deleted member 87819]

….and scraped fourth place after Leicester metaphorically castrated themselves

You can blame Lampard for that

 

[Dr Jacoby]

You can blame Lampard for that

I blame Rodgers :)

 

[Deleted member 87819]

I blame Rodgers :)

I think Rodgers did as well as he could

 

[eastlandsblue]

1) Raiola is not Haaland's agent, Alf is. Raiola is only on board to handle the big move up the ladder.

2) Raiola only moves clients who want to move, like any other agent. That's it.

Really!!! Then someone needs to inform him. Last time I looked he was.

 

[Ric]

A lot of people seem to be resigned to the idea that he’ll go to Chelsea, but I don’t think that it’s a given that they’ll now get him. Will still be an incredibly difficult deal for them to pull off this summer.

 

[Maly]

Mbappe threads that way

They’re getting him too

Or aren’t you aware of their situation? I’ll educate you mate. They’ve got enough cash left over from the Coutinho transfer to purchase both

Can’t believe I have to explain this on a football forum. Disappointed with the lack of football finance knowledge on Blue Moon. This place has gone to the dogs recently