So ok for the final then?Same as Martinez for Villa the other night , absurdly it doesn’t count after extra time.
We won`tWankers. Absolute fucking scum.
Gutted they got away with that. Really thought Coventry would do it having pulled back those three goals.
We cannot lose to that shower of shit in the final, we just can’t.
I hate them as well. Of all the teams I don't want to lose to (however remote that possibility is), it's them. I was lucky enough to get hold of a ticket for last year, thanks to someone on here having his holiday booked (the ticket qualifying never got down to my level). I don't see me being there this time, but I'll be there in spirit.They didn’t deserve that at all. I hate derby games, so I’m not looking forward to that final really
Correct and football isn’t played in a laboratory pulse the spirit of the law and its origin It’s there to stop goal hanging how can someone be doing so mm ahead of an opponent?Not sure why you've nailed your flag to the mast with this for some reason.
“The frame-rate and resolution of the cameras used in VAR sometimes does not keep pace with the fast movements, meaning that sometimes the player or the ball is blurred.
“So, the viewer has to use their own judgement to extrapolate where the players were at the moment the ball was kicked, which affects whether it is offside or not.
“My research found that the ball was kicked 132 milliseconds earlier than the participants perceived, which doesn’t sound like much, but in a fast-paced game it could be long enough for the players to be in a different location and therefore could potentially change the outcomes of offside.
“This goes to show that whilst VAR is useful to spot obvious errors, it shouldn’t be relied upon completely to make referee decisions.”
Motion capture reveals why VAR in football struggles with offside decisions
New research shows why VAR isn't always accurate enough to judge offside moments.www.bath.ac.uk
He's won awards in digital imagery btw, he knows what he is talking about.