The Future's Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 3,302
The only issue I have is that our experts missed an important amendment. Surely we're more professional than that?
spanishblue said:andyhinch said:As Exeter say this is probably in the best interests of club, fucking annoying mind.spanishblue said:So why are we not taking the lying cheating bastards to the cleaners ???????
It will be worse for the club if they think we are a soft touch and pull the same shit next year. If we have done nothing wrong why lay down and let the whip hand of the cartel do what they wish with us.
That's my take on it as well and with the DuPont case coming up, let him get down and dirty and keep our noses clean.Danamy said:andyhinch said:As Exeter say this is probably in the best interests of club, fucking annoying mind.spanishblue said:So why are we not taking the lying cheating bastards to the cleaners ???????
Like it or not the PR would've had a big factor in City's decision, we've spent a lot more money than the fine getting us to where we are in the world, the headline "City take on UEFA" wouldn't of done us any favours with no guarantees of winning.
I doubt anyone 'missed' it. It depends when the 'amendment' was introduced, was it during the last financial year? If it affected the pre 2010 contracts it was maybe too late to go back and do anything about it.The Future's Blue said:The only issue I have is that our experts missed an important amendment. Surely we're more professional than that?
What is truly meaningless is your view of 'reality' - it seems the only drilling down has been in your brain if you think that a hobbled CL squad doesn't harm us.Ducado said:The reason we are not taking them to the cleaners is because the reality is the sanctions are pretty meaningless, it's like they asked us, it looks bad but when you drill it down it really does not effect us, it looks to me like deals have been done, even to releasing it on a Friday night
Misinterpreted, not missed, happens to the best of us. UEFA now have to apply the rules in the way that they've applied them this year.The Future's Blue said:The only issue I have is that our experts missed an important amendment. Surely we're more professional than that?
If it's actually hobbled.George Hannah said:What is truly meaningless is your view of 'reality' - it seems the only drilling down has been in your brain if you think that a hobbled CL squad doesn't harm us.Ducado said:The reason we are not taking them to the cleaners is because the reality is the sanctions are pretty meaningless, it's like they asked us, it looks bad but when you drill it down it really does not effect us, it looks to me like deals have been done, even to releasing it on a Friday night
George Hannah said:What is truly meaningless is your view of 'reality' - it seems the only drilling down has been in your brain if you think that a hobbled CL squad doesn't harm us.Ducado said:The reason we are not taking them to the cleaners is because the reality is the sanctions are pretty meaningless, it's like they asked us, it looks bad but when you drill it down it really does not effect us, it looks to me like deals have been done, even to releasing it on a Friday night
I am referring this cruel remark to our local branch of the Schizophrenics Society of which I am Chairman. I am also the President.Ducado said:George Hannah said:What is truly meaningless is your view of 'reality' - it seems the only drilling down has been in your brain if you think that a hobbled CL squad doesn't harm us.Ducado said:The reason we are not taking them to the cleaners is because the reality is the sanctions are pretty meaningless, it's like they asked us, it looks bad but when you drill it down it really does not effect us, it looks to me like deals have been done, even to releasing it on a Friday night
I await your other "personalities" opinion on the matter, it won't be long till he makes an appearance