Wouldn't surprise if Sky wasn't behind this in the first place protecting there untouchable top 4
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Former Referees's pretty shocking claim (Aguero related)
- Thread starter razman
- Start date
Surprised nobody has mentioned Muroch in all of this.
Sky
Times
Sun
Sky bet
Corrupt as fuck. How can Sky pay all the money they do for TV rights AND have a betting company allowing you to bet on the results of a competition they fund? Blatant to say the least.
Murdoch also wields enough weight to influence other media outlets too. As bent as Berlusconi
Sky
Times
Sun
Sky bet
Corrupt as fuck. How can Sky pay all the money they do for TV rights AND have a betting company allowing you to bet on the results of a competition they fund? Blatant to say the least.
Murdoch also wields enough weight to influence other media outlets too. As bent as Berlusconi
It was yesterday, though he has alluded to it before. Fuck all was done then either funnily enough.Thing is the comments were by Halsey 3yrs ago... They aren't recent.
Why Always Ste
Well-Known Member
Well he said the same thing in his book published 3yrs ago...it was yesterday, the tweet.
I just see this as one tide in the full on ocean of a plug being pulled by sky sports.
Their own fault for being greedy bastards and pricing out subscribers leading to more streamers.
No money to gain = bye bye sly sports
Ffs, Gordon. Are you challenging me to a grammar quiz?Like 'Blue', you mean?
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
Thought they changed the rules that if a referee sees an incident then afterwards gets ask to have another look because of how bad it looked, he can change his mind and tell them I didnt think it was that bad at the time, hey presto a ban!
They did indeed, but it was an hour after the West Ham game.
So is he saying he saw it but got his decision wrong? And how can City be basing the appeal on the fact that he DID see it and therefore the ban is inappropriate?They did indeed, but it was an hour after the West Ham game.
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,066
Not really no. I think he was experienced enough to realise he would take him off without help.When Neville was on a yellow card and then committed a further obvious yellow, does anyone think that baconface was told to sub him quickly by "somebody"?
Blue Hefner
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 14,627
No one will bother investigating these claims, turkeys don't vote for Xmas - and even on the off chance they did 'investigate', the claims would be of down to the ramblings of a disgruntled ex-employee trying to get some publicity
If Mark Halsey is that bothered, why didn't he say something at the time? We are back to Turkeys again.......
Cycling, Olympics, Football leagues all over the world, cricket and in every walk of life people are cheating, trying to get on, taking backhanders and certainly infulenced by what thier bode wants. Yet we are to believe the Premier League is whiter than white.....
If Mark Halsey is that bothered, why didn't he say something at the time? We are back to Turkeys again.......
Cycling, Olympics, Football leagues all over the world, cricket and in every walk of life people are cheating, trying to get on, taking backhanders and certainly infulenced by what thier bode wants. Yet we are to believe the Premier League is whiter than white.....
manimanc
Well-Known Member
We'll have to start calling him Bamber Gascoigne!! And here's your starter for 10.Ffs, Gordon. Are you challenging me to a grammar quiz?