Formula 1 2022

They changed the rules so that not completing the entire race distance means you get maximum points, yet they still keep the 75% points accrued rule for the other races? Why was Suzuka different?

This is nothing to do with Max, before you start, worthy champion this year, this is a critique of the FIA and their seemingly "flexible" rules.
"f a race is suspended in accordance with Article 57, and cannot be resumed" the deductions apply, they got it correct.

It is 6.5.

 
But the race distance changed as a result of the crash, and wasn't the agreed upon distance at the start of the race. The Suzuka race distance was then reduced, with all drivers expecting to get the fewer total of points.

FIA has just gone "Ahh fuck it". As a Max fan wouldn't you have rather he won it next race, which was a foregone conclusion rather than win it THIS way with the FIA adding all this pointless speculation? It's not a great way of winning it, is it.
Even when the race distance is reduced it’s pull points. It’s simply the rule since Spa. The organisation had it right straight away. As it was shown on the light boards.

And I don’t really care how Verstappen won it. He would’ve won it anyways as he was by far the best driver this season. Even today a class ahead of anyone else. Maybe loads on here should recognise this instead of debating decisions.
 
"f a race is suspended in accordance with Article 57, and cannot be resumed" the deductions apply, they got it correct.

It is 6.5.

Yeah, i've got the regulations up, and still cannot see how that applies to Suzuka where the race was red flagged and the race distance reduced = full points. And this is the 2022 document. Suzuka WAS resumed, but at a reduced distance.

"If the leader has completed 50% but less than 75% of the scheduled race distance, points will be awarded in accordance with column 3 of the table below." They did 28 laps of a scheduled 53. That ain't 75%
 
Even when the race distance is reduced it’s pull points. It’s simply the rule since Spa. The organisation had it right straight away. As it was shown on the light boards.

And I don’t really care how Verstappen won it. He would’ve won it anyways as he was by far the best driver this season. Even today a class ahead of anyone else. Maybe loads on here should recognise this instead of debating decisions.
Not according to FIA's own rules. Why do you think everyone looked confused.
 
Yeah, i've got the regulations up, and still cannot see how that applies to Suzuka where the race was red flagged and the race distance reduced = full points. And this is the 2022 document. Suzuka WAS resumed, but at a reduced distance.

"If the leader has completed 50% but less than 75% of the scheduled race distance, points will be awarded in accordance with column 3 of the table below." They did 28 laps of a scheduled 53. That ain't 75%
As reductions only apply if the race is not resumed, you can't read one bit out of context, the above is if the race doesn't finish according to the start of the paragraph.


6.5 If a race is suspended in accordance with Article 57, and cannot be resumed, points for
each title will be awarded in accordance with the following criteria:

a) No points will be awarded If the leader has completed less than two (2) laps.
b) In each case detailed in Article 6.5c), 6.5d), 6.5e) and 6.5f), no points will be
awarded unless a minimum of two (2) laps have been completed by the leader
without a Safety Car and/or VSC intervention.
c) If the leader has completed two (2) laps but less than 25% of the scheduled race
distance, points will be awarded in accordance with column 1 of the table below.
d) If the leader has completed 25% but less than 50% of the scheduled race distance,
points will be awarded in accordance with column 2 of the table below.
e) If the leader has completed 50% but less than 75% of the scheduled race distance,
points will be awarded in accordance with column 3 of the table below.
f) If the leader has completed 75% or more of the scheduled race distance, full points
will be awarded in accordance with Article 6.4.

The bullet point you posted was clearly qualified.

I can't see how this is confusing once the new rules had been read.
 
According to the BBC, the rules as written have been properly applied to make Max champion. But the rules fail to meet their intended aim due to a drafting error:


"the historical precedent (is) that reduced points are awarded in such circumstances. But it seems that this protocol was inadvertently left out of the rules when they were rewritten over last winter following the controversial Belgian Grand Prix, when a result was declared despite no racing taking place."

Silly old FIA!
 
As reductions only apply if the race is not resumed, you can't read one bit out of context, the above is if the race doesn't finish according to the earlier paragraphs.
Which regulation states that? Re-read it; that stipulation isn't in there!

1665314808850.jpeg
 
Last edited:
According to the BBC, the rules as written have been properly applied to make Max champion. But the rules fail to meet their intended aim due to a drafting error:


"the historical precedent (is) that reduced points are awarded in such circumstances. But it seems that this protocol was inadvertently left out of the rules when they were rewritten over last winter following the controversial Belgian Grand Prix, when a result was declared despite no racing taking place."

Silly old FIA!
Precisely. Their own rules for awarding points is so baffling each race appears to be on a situational basis as to whether they apply or not. No wonder everyone was confused. "Oh sorry, we forgot to put it in!"

Aye, you did!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.