Fulham (H) FA Cup 4th Round - Pre-Match Thread

Discussion in 'Bluemoon forum' started by David 'El Mago' Silva, 22 Jan 2020.

?

Fulham (H) Prediction

  1. Win

  2. Lose

  3. Draw

Results are only viewable after voting.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ws01

    ws01

    Joined:
    6 Nov 2011
    Messages:
    3,643
    Last season it was more of the Bravo of La Liga. This season he seems to have resorted back to the 16/17 Bravo - a liability and almost incapable of making a decent save.

    Resorting to childish insults without ever bothering to explain your position seems to be your MO. Grow up.
     
  2. r.soleofsalford

    r.soleofsalford

    Joined:
    28 Jan 2009
    Messages:
    18,454
    Location:
    rag central the blue part.

    That a vast majority of fans think Bravo is shite and not fit to play in this team
     
  3. mosssideblue

    mosssideblue

    Joined:
    6 Dec 2013
    Messages:
    19,088
    Location:
    Deep under the Ocean
    Lol. As I posted, what message would that send
     
  4. mosssideblue

    mosssideblue

    Joined:
    6 Dec 2013
    Messages:
    19,088
    Location:
    Deep under the Ocean
    I did explain, the fact you are so narrow minded in your thinking is not my issue. Have a think about the post I originally responded to and the clue about what message it would send and see if any penny drops
     
  5. ws01

    ws01

    Joined:
    6 Nov 2011
    Messages:
    3,643
    You haven't explained, at all, and are obscure for no particular reason whatsoever whilst continuing to resort to childish personal insults. This is a debate forum, not a place where people are expected to read the mind of some random poster.

    Moving on, as you aren't making any salient point - Eddie to start please Pep.
     
    r.soleofsalford likes this.
  6. blueparrot

    blueparrot

    Joined:
    7 Jun 2012
    Messages:
    13,340
    Bravo will play, so really that's all there is to it. IMO he should play because there's a bigger picture and we'll win if he plays.
     
    mosssideblue likes this.
  7. JGL07

    JGL07

    Joined:
    18 Jan 2011
    Messages:
    1,941
    Location:
    Edinburgh
    Team supported:
    Manchester City/Hibernian
    I think that even the dumbest should be able to work out that should Ederson pick up an injury or a suspension, it makes sense to have a replacement available with some match conditioning.

    With Muric on loan, Bravo is the only viable option. Apart from anything else have City not won penalty shoot outs with Bravo in goals over the last two years or so? City also have good record in domestic cups recently.
     
    blueparrot likes this.
  8. blueparrot

    blueparrot

    Joined:
    7 Jun 2012
    Messages:
    13,340
    It's obvious to anyone Ederson is No 1 and our best keeper. It's also obvious to our managers whether it's Pep or his predecessors.So if we pick the second keeper for cups , at the moment Bravo it's obviously for very good thought out reason.
     
  9. mosssideblue

    mosssideblue

    Joined:
    6 Dec 2013
    Messages:
    19,088
    Location:
    Deep under the Ocean
    I will spell it out for you

    We both want was is best for the club. Bravo has done nothing wrong in the cup games other than being instrumental in our success in gathering silverware. Now, I appreciate you dont like him and accept that is your opinion.

    My issue is that he will be replaced next season and any future number two is going to think twice about joining, being given the cup games and injury cover if they think the manager is going to stiff them as we approach the later stages of a cup. We need a competent number two for when needed

    Bravo will start and rightly so, but lets think a little broader than just your bias as to what is best for the club both short and long term
     
  10. mosssideblue

    mosssideblue

    Joined:
    6 Dec 2013
    Messages:
    19,088
    Location:
    Deep under the Ocean
    Clearly not
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page