You said a BLACK man on fire infront of a crowd of WHITE people. You're honestly expecting me to believe you weren't getting at it being racist in some way?
It's a strange mind that actually comes up with that conclusion.
Ha! Me tooI'm outraged.
It is a coincidence with no intention to be racist.
Personally, I don't give a monkey's what someone like you thinks.
It means the same here. It's meant as a compliment.Maybe it's another americanism sneaking in, but it's a compliment. When's someone's on fire it means they're on it, they're hot, not at all derogatory and a bunch of PC bullshit to think otherwise
Pastoral scene of the gallant southWhat is the problem?
Pastoral scene of the gallant south
The bulging eyes and the twisted mouth
Scent of magnolias, sweet and fresh
Then the sudden smell of burning flesh
Indeed.Strange Fruit?
Indeed.
I'm led to believe that the image in Q, is that of a dark skinned man, in flames, while a predominately white audience whoops and a hollers.
Is this the problem?
Maybe in the deep south, not so much in Manchester.Indeed.
I'm led to believe that the image in Q, is that of a dark skinned man, in flames, while a predominately white audience whoops and a hollers.
Is this the problem?
Levenshulme?Maybe in the deep south, not so much in Manchester.
I agree. Although what fun we'd have had if Liverpool had released a similar image...I think that picture is a long way from anything, even remotely, related to the KKK
It's a but naff, but it's for children.
Why mention it then?!
Maybe you should start caring what somebody like me thinks, you might learn something and wont make a fool of yourself in the future.
I think it's pretty obvious what you inferred in your post without having to look for something, namely as you referenced race.I never said it was racist, I said it was 'weird'.
It is you who is 'looking for something that isn't there' with my post.