garry cook's naiviety has cost us everything

wearethesouthstand

Well-Known Member
Joined
5 Feb 2008
Messages
1,893
1. backing hughes so that when we enter the transfer window we are hovering above the transfer window = less chance of signing good players

2. agreeing to have the 2nd meeting at milan's hq - where thousands of their fans can congregate - why didnt he insist on moving it to a different location ? he isn't a football man and under-estimated the power of fan power

3. because we kept hughes on too long we have now had a major setback - any good players will now feel it acceptable to turn us down and the only players we will ever get are mercaneries like bellamy - not only that cook's blinkered backing of hughes has now cost us robinho - without kaka there is nothing for robinho to stay for

whilst the MEN will say there is no shame in failing to land a world star like kaka - that wa sthe whole point of our strategy and if our strategy doesnt work then we have no plan b
 
we didnt have a divine right to sign kaka,

he is a man of integrity and loyalty, one who is literally god to the milan fans.

kaka wants for nothing, he doesnt need our money,


hats off to city for attempting to sign kaka, better that than jason van bleerk.

i for one will be made up if we go for arshavin and santa cruz, because by the start of february we will have a team that could easily win the uefa cup.

i am dissapointed but not downhearted, is it any more embarrasing for city to miss out on kaka, than for ronaldo to spend all summer (after the best season of anyones life) to tout himself for a move to madrid.

lets enjoy the ride the specualtion, and remember our not too distant past.
 
wearethesouthstand said:
1. backing hughes so that when we enter the transfer window we are hovering above the transfer window = less chance of signing good players

2. agreeing to have the 2nd meeting at milan's hq - where thousands of their fans can congregate - why didnt he insist on moving it to a different location ? he isn't a football man and under-estimated the power of fan power

3. because we kept hughes on too long we have now had a major setback - any good players will now feel it acceptable to turn us down and the only players we will ever get are mercaneries like bellamy - not only that cook's blinkered backing of hughes has now cost us robinho - without kaka there is nothing for robinho to stay for

whilst the MEN will say there is no shame in failing to land a world star like kaka - that wa sthe whole point of our strategy and if our strategy doesnt work then we have no plan b


mate he isnt a football man ?
he might not of played the game, but he knows all about the inside of the game, its him who got all the big names in nike boots, and who got clubs in nike kits, he has been in the game years building nike up to a leading brand in football, he was top notch, and he will be for city.
 
wearethesouthstand said:
1. backing hughes so that when we enter the transfer window we are hovering above the transfer window = less chance of signing good players

2. agreeing to have the 2nd meeting at milan's hq - where thousands of their fans can congregate - why didnt he insist on moving it to a different location ? he isn't a football man and under-estimated the power of fan power

3. because we kept hughes on too long we have now had a major setback - any good players will now feel it acceptable to turn us down and the only players we will ever get are mercaneries like bellamy - not only that cook's blinkered backing of hughes has now cost us robinho - without kaka there is nothing for robinho to stay for

whilst the MEN will say there is no shame in failing to land a world star like kaka - that wa sthe whole point of our strategy and if our strategy doesnt work then we have no plan b

I bet you would rather have a knicker salesman from Stalybridge ( Kenyon) who allows pictures of players you havent signed to be posted on an official website, wouldnt you...
 
fathellensbellend said:
we didnt have a divine right to sign kaka,

he is a man of integrity and loyalty, one who is literally god to the milan fans.

kaka wants for nothing, he doesnt need our money,


hats off to city for attempting to sign kaka, better that than jason van bleerk.

i for one will be made up if we go for arshavin and santa cruz, because by the start of february we will have a team that could easily win the uefa cup.

i am dissapointed but not downhearted, is it any more embarrasing for city to miss out on kaka, than for ronaldo to spend all summer (after the best season of anyones life) to tout himself for a move to madrid.

lets enjoy the ride the specualtion, and remember our not too distant past.
well said
 
wearethesouthstand said:
1. backing hughes so that when we enter the transfer window we are hovering above the transfer window = less chance of signing good players

2. agreeing to have the 2nd meeting at milan's hq - where thousands of their fans can congregate - why didnt he insist on moving it to a different location ? he isn't a football man and under-estimated the power of fan power

3. because we kept hughes on too long we have now had a major setback - any good players will now feel it acceptable to turn us down and the only players we will ever get are mercaneries like bellamy - not only that cook's blinkered backing of hughes has now cost us robinho - without kaka there is nothing for robinho to stay for

whilst the MEN will say there is no shame in failing to land a world star like kaka - that wa sthe whole point of our strategy and if our strategy doesnt work then we have no plan b

yawn yawn yawn
 
Do you not get fed up with the negative comments from so called supporters? Lets get behind the club. We are in a better position than we were this time last year.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.