George Floyd murder | Clashes between US police and protestors

Status
Not open for further replies.
The police will have been told not to strike out. By the time they ran they were in survival mode. They weren’t equipped for the job and we’re let down by their leaders.

Tooling the police up invariably generates more trouble and greater violence. Protests are like pressure cookers, better to let the steam out in controlled bursts rather than just clamping down. Like letting them take down a statue no one gives a shit about and dumping it in the Avon. The alternative is smashed skulls and claret everywhere.
 
The saddest thing for me personally about the weekend is that during last week I felt well disposed towards BLM, but now get that same feeling as I get when jehovas witnesses approach my house when I see BLM protesters on the news. All to do with their behaviour rather than the message itself. Sad.

Some people on a demo get out of order and all of a sudden you no longer give a shit about people being murdered by the police?

Which means the police think they can carry on doing it which then leads to even more trouble?

You reckon maybe you are part of the problem?
 
Fair enough. Your reply put me on the spot when you asked ‘so what do we do now’! Not sure how we put the injustice right now.

Only thing I’d add is the money to former colonies doesn’t help the people who have been disadvantaged and discriminated against their whole life.

It doesn’t you’re right but the true victims have been dead over 2 centuries, so I’m unsure the best way of putting things right, other than making our society as equal as it possibly can be, which I genuinely feel in the UK, we’re not far off at all.

I’ve asked black people specifically and Bigga kindly shared his views on here. From what I’ve heard it seems it’s a lack of representation in top roles and individual racism from the public and a minority of police officers that is the current issues in the UK.

I can’t see a specific law or right that’s discriminatory but happy to hear one if I’ve missed it?

Regarding the top roles point, major businesses have lots of diversity quotas now and are actively trying to diversify their boards and middle management roles. All of my clients do it, as do we.

Regarding then 2nd part, the only way to improve individuals from being racist, is to improve education in this topic.

My view is the best way to make amends is to make life better for people in the present and future.
 
I understand that mate but premeditating the removal of Churchill’s statue isn’t the way to go at all.

He’s got a mixed past, with some very immoral actions and views but ultimately, the world would have been horrific if it wasn’t for him, the lives he saved from taking a stand shouldn’t be underestimated.

Even the likes of O’Brien and Galloway, on the left, are positive towards Churchill.

The problem is, these new extreme protesters, not the general number, more the minority of political groups that whip it up, they only look at people in black and white (no pun intended) and ignore the grey areas and complexities of major historical figures.

Churchill mobilised a nation to defeat fascism.

His greatest contribution wasn't in fighting, it was in resisting and included resisting his own cabinet who wanted to negotiate and tolerate fascism by peace with Nazi Germany.

No doubt he'd laugh at his statue being defaced or pulled down if it had been.

He probably had more in common with the protesters than many would believe and I'd say today he'd be stood out there with them.
 
Three letters in caps is "all shouty", is it? Myself and the said poster have had our debate. He's been battered by everyone else since.

Why are you involved?
Highlighted your hypocrisy

Your 'debate' started with you replying to the other poster when he had been in discussion with someone else - so did you not apply the same question to yourself about why you should be involved?

Or is it OK for you to get all aggressive and shouty with people but then you object to others doing what you do by quoting a post of yours?

As I say - straightforward hypocrisy

And anyway - all I was pointing out was that because of your 'style' it could be understandable why posters do not feel inclined to exchange posts with you

It was a simple question that presented you with the opportunity for some self-reflection and perhaps a change of your 'style' - which may have led to people thinking that you were worth debating with

Just consider it as me seeking to help you
 
Last edited:
Churchill mobilised a nation to defeat fascism.

His greatest contribution wasn't in fighting, it was in resisting and included resisting his own cabinet who wanted to negotiate and tolerate fascism by peace with Nazi Germany.

No doubt he'd laugh at his statue being defaced or pulled down if it had been.

He probably had more in common with the protesters than many would believe and I'd say today he'd be stood out there with them.

There’s certain people out there on the fringe that are so anti UK they’d have likely sided with any Nazi invader, whilst ironically calling themselves Antifa.
 
"They're lucky that what black people are looking for is equality and not revenge." Incredibly powerful words from Kimberley Jones. I assume it's already been posted numerous times already this week, but always worth repeating.



And here's some background on the rigged game of Monopoly that she's referring to.
"Hey! That's not fair I didn't even get to choose what color I was when we started"
"Yeah no one does"



Man, my Sister is SO right!!

It's funny cos I've had my Tulsa story tab open on my Google for AGES as I look over it every now and then. Dealing with how jealous White people were that money was flowing through Tulsa, so they acted.

Lo and behold, the 'Watchmen' happened and it got low ratings as brilliant as it was taking license from the story.

I urge people to watch it on Netflix.

I wish I could 'like' your post ten times more.
 
Tooling the police up invariably generates more trouble and greater violence. Protests are like pressure cookers, better to let the steam out in controlled bursts rather than just clamping down. Like letting them take down a statue no one gives a shit about and dumping it in the Avon. The alternative is smashed skulls and claret everywhere.

Nobody gives a shit about the statue in Bristol. Bob. Sending out coppers to be cannon fodder on the streets of our capital is another matter. Yes I can understand most of the police wearing standard issue gear for most of the day but security forces need to be responsive enough to adapt to increasingly risky situations with appropriately equipped and trained personnel.
 
Churchill mobilised a nation to defeat fascism.

His greatest contribution wasn't in fighting, it was in resisting and included resisting his own cabinet who wanted to negotiate and tolerate fascism by peace with Nazi Germany.

No doubt he'd laugh at his statue being defaced or pulled down if it had been.

He probably had more in common with the protesters than many would believe.
I would hazard a guess 50% of the protesters wouldn't know who Winston Churchill was. A lot of youngsters today have no idea of history or geography and it is quite frightening if it isn't on Facebook or twitter they're fucked
 
Your final point seems to have answered your questions. The rest has nothing to do with anything I've said.

How so? you lamented

"And then one wonders why all the ACAB signs and brutality claims? "

My top part was a reply to that, ACAB became prominent in the 70s/80s in this country when the police force was heavy handed and partially militarised to combat protests.

The rest was my experience of police indifference to minor crimes through no fault of their own I might ad, which has led to a lack of respect for them fr9m some in society.

I have no issues with the police I have family previously in the force and RUC, but I also know, as a football fan a few over zelous officers on an away day can mean unecessary slap round the head as I have had on the way to the swamp or being sectioned 60'd for singing on a train.
 
But they were equipped with normal PPE. Asp, cuffs, spray, vests.

Police in this country are not para military. As things escalated PSU officers (nato helmets, body armour, batons) were brought in. PSU officers only represent a v small minority of frontline police-its always been a voluntary speciality.

The public have a responsibility to behave themselves.

I don't disagree.

However, one has to take precautionary measures when dealing with protest. Looking at the USA would have a good indicator.

It was also unprofessional of commanding officers to send volunteers to do what should be a paid job.
 
Nobody gives a shit about the statue in Bristol. Bob. Sending out coppers to be cannon fodder on the streets of our capital is another matter. Yes I can understand most of the police wearing standard issue gear for most of the day but security forces need to be responsive enough to adapt to increasingly risky situations with appropriately equipped and trained personnel.
They're in a lose/lose situation. If they go in equipped the get accused of inciting the protests. It was a softly softly approach as to not antagonise and inflame the situation
 
There’s certain people out there on the fringe that are so anti UK they’d have likely sided with any Nazi invader, whilst ironically calling themselves Antifa.

No doubt but the one reason why Churchill isn't looked on kindly by the left is due to his views on the creation of Israel.

That's why they are quick to call him racist but completely ignore the fact that he fought and resisted the greatest racist threat the world has ever seen.

The one thing Churchill never stood for was likening the views on the far-right that is for sure.
 
I think this is largely a stupid sentiment to make given history didn't begin and end today with the west plundering Africa.

Should Italians pay the UK reparations for the damage caused to the UK by the Roman empire?

What about the Norwegians and the Vikings?

What about the Spanish and the US/South America?

Thank you.
 
I understand that mate but premeditating the removal of Churchill’s statue isn’t the way to go at all.

He’s got a mixed past, with some very immoral actions and views but ultimately, the world would have been horrific if it wasn’t for him, the lives he saved from taking a stand shouldn’t be underestimated.

Even the likes of O’Brien and Galloway, on the left, are positive towards Churchill.

The problem is, these new extreme protesters, not the general number, more the minority of political groups that whip it up, they only look at people in black and white (no pun intended) and ignore the grey areas and complexities of major historical figures.

I don’t think some guy on Twitter with ‘daft’ in his handle and musing about taking down Churchill’s statue is that big a concern. No one is seriously arguing that Churchill, whatever his shortcomings, wasn’t a vital leader at a crucial time.

But it does seem odd to me this concern for statues or the panic over a handful of policemen getting chased off. Yet if the situation was reversed, and heads were being cracked by police, the same people would be cheering them on. People die in police custody, black and white, and have been doing so for years and there are never any prosecutions. We saw from Hillsborough how the police lie and cover up deaths, yet that never seems as important or as concerning as some people misbehaving at a protest.
 
What's this supposed to be?

Irony?

No more ironic than White people starting violence at a Black Lives matter protest and leaving it to BLM protesters to take the brunt of police brutality.

It's unfortunate and stupid of both acts.

I think it’s supposed to be deflection.
 
No doubt but the one reason why Churchill isn't looked on kindly by the left is due to his views on the creation of Israel.

That's why they are quick to call him racist but completely ignore the fact that he fought and resisted the greatest racist threat the world has ever seen.

The one thing Churchill never stood for was likening the views on the far-right that is for sure.

And the famine he ignored.

There’s no doubt he would have been extreme by today’s standards but they really are missing the point about what he did from 1940-45.
 
What's stupid about Africa being directly in its state with current interference by western democracy?

Unless China has managed a geographical magic trick and moved id suggest you look again at which superpower is currently spreading its influence and plundering the African continent at an alarming rate.
 
Can't really take that seriously with the "RACIST BRITAIN?" tagline at the top.

This doesn't do anything to refute the issues with racism in Britain.

I just keep thinking it's an odd thing for leave.eu to go out on a limb for.

What does an organisation about leaving the eu have to do with black equality?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top