richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 31,835
This would move quick as he’s ready to go and already in a sense out of his club. Ederson fee agreement seems imminent and there is no point creating a circus around this to be hones
Not the same at all when we bought Haaland nobody was saying we shouldn’t he was the best 9 which was pretty much undisputed and we didn’t have one, but we’d had one before in Aguero.Donnarumma situation is same as Haaland...
Back then, everyone was talking what a big mistake it was from Pep to sign classic N9, when we used to play with False9 and had a lot of success.
But Haaland wasn't an ordinary player, he was and is best N9 and therefore for such players you can make exceptions.
Donnarumma is best GK and if it wasn't him, PSG wouldn't have won the CL.
I'm sure he will have same impact as Haaland had and Pep once again will be pioneer. Look what other teams are doing. Arsenal bought classic N9, Liverpool, United, Chelsea. It wouldn't have happened if Pep hadn't signed Haaland and showed that in football everything is relative and depends on quality of players you have.
Right now every team has ball-playing GK, so City has to be innovative and unique once again.
You can't win if you play like others.
In 2016 everyone was joking about Pep's style as we were unique and didn't play like others, but in the end everyone started to play like us. Teams even started recruiting Pep's assistants to copy our style. If not Pep, Arsenal would have never recruited Arteta, Bayern - Kompany, Real - Alonso, Chelsea - Maresca, etc.
Yeah seems people are quite divided on this. Everybody being all in, or all out.Not the same at all when we bought Haaland nobody was saying we shouldn’t he was the best 9 which was pretty much undisputed and we didn’t have one, but we’d had one before in Aguero.
Donnarumma isn’t the best keeper out there and I’d say it’s a fairly even split of fans that think it’s a good move and those that don’t.
Name three better goalkeepers than him. I'm waiting for your answer. And take age into account too.Not the same at all when we bought Haaland nobody was saying we shouldn’t he was the best 9 which was pretty much undisputed and we didn’t have one, but we’d had one before in Aguero.
Donnarumma isn’t the best keeper out there and I’d say it’s a fairly even split of fans that think it’s a good move and those that don’t.
Only one that is equal the one at Real MadridName three better goalkeepers than him. I'm waiting for your answer. And take age into account too.
Ortega is probably fed up being second choice, and I would agree with himI like Donnaruma but he’s going to cost an absolute fortune. It would make the move for Trafford seem a little strange to me because Ortega could be second choice and we’d have saved a few quid
Don’t watch that much of other teams to have an extensive list., but would have Courtois and Oblak above him. I’d also put peak Ederson and Alison as better all round keepers. Plus never said we shouldn’t buy him but can see why we’d have our doubts too.Name three better goalkeepers than him. I'm waiting for your answer. And take age into account too.
Probably but might also depend who are offering him first choice spots.Ortega is probably fed up being second choice, and I would agree with him
Semi final in the champions league against Madrid at the bernabeu. Who would you rather have in goal Donnarumma or Trafford.
Also pointless because at that point it’s all about mentality and self confidence,and we know Donnarumma has that big game mentality , Trafford we don’t but if he’s got to a semi final then he probably has.Totally depends on their form and role in getting to said semifinal. It is a pointless question.
Of courseProbably but might also depend who are offering him first choice spots.
Donnarumma situation is same as Haaland...
Back then, everyone was talking what a big mistake it was from Pep to sign classic N9, when we used to play with False9 and had a lot of success.
But Haaland wasn't an ordinary player, he was and is best N9 and therefore for such players you can make exceptions.
Only suspect if compared to Ederson, otherwise it was good.If you think Traffords is suspect though wait until you see Donnarumma give it a go, if he comes.Trafford had a great game yesterday, bar his suspect kicking at times.
If we get Donna (I heard a rumour) we will have two fantastic goal keepers who will battle echo other for the first team goal keeping jersey.
Bring it on!
I don’t dispute anything you have said mate, it just makes the Trafford purchase a little odd in my opinion. I think if this does materialise then we’re going to stifle Trafford’s development and I’m not convinced it was the plan until Donnaruma became available.He's fallen out with PSG and has one year left on his contract. It will be an expensive contract but he'd also lead to strong merchandising revenues. He's a star player.
Quite probably, mate.Ortega is probably fed up being second choice, and I would agree with him
Why would we rotate keepers?
I struggle to see why so many City fans are baulking at Donnarumma when he has been one of the standout goalkeeper in European football for the last 5 years. Trafford might be able to play at that level. But the operative word there is might. Your option carries risk.
Clearly I'm missing something here. These are both games against Arsenal and the final against Inter. Seems more than adequate with his feet.Only suspect if compared to Ederson, otherwise it was good.If you think Traffords is suspect though wait until you see Donnarumma give it a go, if he comes.