Great article in the Guardian incite into Elano and cliques.

Da_Blu_Moona

Well-Known Member
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Messages
973
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/nov/11/manchester-city-abu-dhabi-cliques" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009 ... bi-cliques</a>

The reaction has been understated, to say the least. When the plane carrying Manchester City's players touched down at Abu Dhabi airport there was no welcoming committee as such. No television crews, no autograph hunters, nobody flashing cameras in the players' faces, no police escort to whisk them to the seven-star opulence of the Emirates Palace hotel. A scattering of locals were there to see them train for the first time last night – but only a scattering.

They are here for a training camp, to get away from the Mancunian climate and play a friendly against the United Arab Emirates national team tomorrow night in what will eventually become an annual fixture at the Zayed Sports City, certainly as long as the sheikhs of Abu Dhabi's ruling Nahyan family, the richest men on earth (sitting on 9% of the planet's oil reserves) are bankrolling the club.

The ground will be full, the last of the 26,000 tickets being distributed on Monday, but the players have been able to walk unnoticed through the vertiginous shopping malls that line the eight-lane highways here and, at times, it has evoked memories of when Manchester United tried to crack the United States in 2003, a tour notable for Sir Bobby Charlton being introduced to the crowd as Bobby Carlton, games being interrupted for weather reports and the announcement of disallowed goals, and being told at the New York Giants Stadium that Ryan Giggs had won 486 caps in his 32-year career.

The difference, of course, is that City are not here to crack Abu Dhabi because, quite simply, they already have enough zeros in their bank account. It is about getting some warm weather on their backs and maybe, too, some team bonding among a newly assembled group of players who have been fragmented by cliques during the more troubled moments of Mark Hughes's 17 months since replacing Sven‑Goran Eriksson as manager.

It has been a difficult process for Hughes, removing the players he felt were undermining his authority and it has led to the situation where Robinho, without Elano Blumer, Jô and Gláuber Berti, is now telling his advisers he feels so isolated and unhappy he cannot tolerate staying in Manchester beyond January. The Brazilian has not disrupted the club's sunshine break as spectacularly as the trip to Tenerife in January when he flew to Rio without informing his employers, but it is still an issue that suggests there is a long way to go before Hughes has fostered the sense of togetherness he craves from his players.

Stephen Ireland remembers the dressing room as being "cliquey" in Hughes's first season in charge, and that the manager took "some time to get a grip of the club". Elano, who was so close to Robinho they have been described as "long-lost twins", was a key agitator. He, Jô and Robinho were all fined for various indiscretions.

"He [Hughes] had it tough," Ireland recalls. "Some players didn't want to be there. Some players just didn't want to buy into it. Elano and Jô, they didn't want to put in the extra effort and it wasn't like it was that hard. It wasn't like you were being run like a dog, just that it was more professional and more based on team spirit, and these players didn't want to get into that stuff."

Elano was subsequently sold to Galatasaray. "Under Sven, Elano got away with anything," Ireland continues. "It was Elano's world, to be honest. The gaffer came in and there were massive changes, and Elano couldn't adjust. He's a great guy, a nice guy, I got on great with him, and he's a very talented player, but he could have added a lot more to his game and been a lot better than what he is."

"It was a shame because I am sure they [Elano and Jô] will look back and regret it. Even with Elano, he didn't play too often last year but when he did play, he did improve. He might not say that himself, but he added an awful lot to his game, which I think was down to the gaffer – but I don't think Elano would admit that or even realise it."

Ireland fits very much into the pro-Hughes camp. "He had to come into a club that had been damaged down the years, with players not having a winning mentality, people accepting defeat, accepting losing away from home, accepting things that just weren't right. Mark Hughes came in with his own staff and worked to make that right. The first meeting the gaffer ever had was about what we [the management] are going to offer you [the players] and the advice was to get on board. They said: 'If you do, you won't have problems, but if you choose not to you will find it very tough'."

A recent training session began at 2pm but Ireland found himself arriving for work at 11.20am. "You feel you just want to be there. Sven was a lovely guy, a very good person, I got on great with him, but for where City are aiming to go, you definitely need a manager like Mark Hughes. With Sven, you would turn up at 9.25am, train at 9.30am and be gone back home at 11.30am; you just wanted to get back as quickly as possible."

This is the disappointment for Hughes: that Robinho is not, it seems, willing to buy into the new regime when he believes there are greater adventures to be had at Barcelona. He was the first player to sign up to the Abu Dhabi revolution but when the sheikhs take their seats in the royal box tomorrow he will be missing because of his injured ankle and, despite the denials, there is every chance this fixture will have to get used to going ahead without him in future years.

To be totally honest I was Elano's biggest fan without exaggeration and was gutted to see a player who had 10 goals and 10 assists in his first season being marginalised under Hughes. But I can see now, that it's something the manager HAD to do, even if he didn't want to. It's a shame really as Ireland says in this piece Elano COULD have been a premier league great, he had the passing ability and vision to rival any top class playmaker but just lacked the work rate. Shame. Funnily enough, after a great few first games for Galatasaray he has quietened down and looks "asleep" in games their fans have told me. Sounds all too familiar sadly.

Conversely and interestingly, anyone else think that he works his bollocks off in that Brasil shirt though? Wonder why? Diego, Ronaldinho et al on the bench perhaps?
 
I bet Jo is not too impressed reading that - technically he is still ours and he's obviously regarded as a lazy git by City both at player and coach levels. Not that he can really argue against it...

Good read though - thanks for the link. Also interesting in light of recent suggestions that Ireland is not happy under Hughes - I guess the interview may have been before any of that, but probably not.
 
bluetonium said:
I bet Jo is not too impressed reading that - technically he is still ours and he's obviously regarded as a lazy git by City both at player and coach levels. Not that he can really argue against it...

Good read though - thanks for the link. Also interesting in light of recent suggestions that Ireland is not happy under Hughes - I guess the interview may have been before any of that, but probably not.

I wasn't too impressed with Jo, i hope he reads this.
 
there is an an interesting article on football 365 about how Hughes is escaping criticism as he isnt foreign and is only a care-taker manager

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.football365.com/story/0,17033,13320_5688115,00" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.football365.com/story/0,1703 ... 5688115,00</a>.
 
KenTheLandlord said:
I wasn't too impressed with Jo, i hope he reads this.
Yeah, not many people were. Makes you wonder if it was a pure panic buy by Thaksin? I mean, I know he was tipped as a future star, and apparently a few clubs were tracking him - always telling though for me when you hear that and yet nobody else bids for them, just like Bianchi.
 
I hope articles like this help to dispel the myth that it's just about spending money and picking 11 players for a match. It would be difficult enough turning round a club which had a history of stability but a far more challenging job at one like ours.

With all the money spent it's easy to forget that little more than 15 months ago we were so close to total collapse.
 
Kind of commented on this on another thread on the same article.

Two things though, it's uncanny how many times when things aren't going well on the field that a new article comes out and the names Jo, Elano and Sven appear in it. I wonder how long that will go on.

Secondly, I'm fairly sure it's against club policy to comment publicly on the attitude of someone who is still a club employee. We'd all be fairly confident that Hughes is livid about this latest breach of policy and a club fine for superman is on it's way. Right?
 
bluetonium said:
I bet Jo is not too impressed reading that - technically he is still ours and he's obviously regarded as a lazy git by City both at player and coach levels. Not that he can really argue against it...

Good read though - thanks for the link. Also interesting in light of recent suggestions that Ireland is not happy under Hughes - I guess the interview may have been before any of that, but probably not.

Yeah, I was thinking pretty much the same thing. The impression I get is that ever since Hughes became our manager, Ireland is someone who has constantly stood four-square behind him.

It really is a shame about Elano - like almost everyone else, I thought he looked fantastic in those heady early days of the Sven regime but he started going off the boil during that same season under Sven. He still had some good games last season when called upon but for one reason or another he comes across as a bit of a sulk. I'm not saying Ireland is right, but if he is then there wasn't too much adjusting that Elano needed to do to fall into line with Hughes' own management style.
 
M18CTID said:
It really is a shame about Elano - like almost everyone else, I thought he looked fantastic in those heady early days of the Sven regime but he started going off the boil during that same season under Sven. He still had some good games last season when called upon but for one reason or another he comes across as a bit of a sulk. I'm not saying Ireland is right, but if he is then there wasn't too much adjusting that Elano needed to do to fall into line with Hughes' own management style.

One thing that is evident from this season, is that if you play good players out of position, or in roles that they are not really suited for then their performances will suffer. Stevie I will probably admit that himself. For me, I first called Elano being played out of position halfway through Svens reign, whether he was being directed to do so or it was his own position I thought he was withdrawing more and more into a more defensive position. And I think his game suffered for it, as an attacking midfielder, a role we didn't see him play all that much he was exceptional.

Having said all that he was very much the architect of his own demise at the club, which is a great shame for us all.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.