I'm With Stupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2013
- Messages
- 20,474
But that's the easy part. The question is whether you can tell a 'good' pint from a 'bad' pint without looking at the pour. I assumed someone would have done it, but no-one has properly done a blind taste test. There was one bloke on Youtube, and he couldn't even tell which was from a can, nevermind distinguish between the one and two-part pour. But that's just one bloke. I'd like to see it done with self-professed Guinness connoisseurs.OK, thanks, appreciated.
But I can honestly say I can tell a good pint of Guinness from a bad one before I've put it to my lips, just by watching the pour, in most cases.
This video shows some footage of the early beer pouring:
So obviously the origins of the two-part pour have legitimate reasoning, but the question is whether Guinness have held onto it for marketing reasons when you could quite happily pour it like any other beer in the bar nowadays.