BamberBridgeBlue
Well-Known Member
But we’re not going to bid against ourselves are we? We’re holding a knife at each other’s throat. The reported £120 million plus realistic add ons £150 million is reasonable all round I think. Beyond that you can argue until the cows come home who loses out more for no sale. City going into a season without a striker, same as last season (although we didn’t know that at the time), or Spurs with their huge stadium that needs paying off on the back of a COVID affected season and no other asset that is going to be worth the same amount next year?Very true… Levy doesn’t seem to work like that though, he has a player we badly need and as such I can see him (I would if I was in his shoes) adding more money on to his asset. How badly do we want him I’d ask, how important of a signing is he? But he knows the answers to those questions already because it’s clear for any9me to see.
As for those demanding Haaland, there’s zero chance of him joining us in my opinion. It’s pointless expecting a buy out clause to be activated and him just joining… We won’t be the only ones activating it.
In my humble opinion we get affected for a season, Spurs get affected for a decade.