Harry Kane

Very true… Levy doesn’t seem to work like that though, he has a player we badly need and as such I can see him (I would if I was in his shoes) adding more money on to his asset. How badly do we want him I’d ask, how important of a signing is he? But he knows the answers to those questions already because it’s clear for any9me to see.
As for those demanding Haaland, there’s zero chance of him joining us in my opinion. It’s pointless expecting a buy out clause to be activated and him just joining… We won’t be the only ones activating it.
But we’re not going to bid against ourselves are we? We’re holding a knife at each other’s throat. The reported £120 million plus realistic add ons £150 million is reasonable all round I think. Beyond that you can argue until the cows come home who loses out more for no sale. City going into a season without a striker, same as last season (although we didn’t know that at the time), or Spurs with their huge stadium that needs paying off on the back of a COVID affected season and no other asset that is going to be worth the same amount next year?
In my humble opinion we get affected for a season, Spurs get affected for a decade.
 
Lol, that chance in the first half that Mahrez has wasted should have been a goal, and nothing else. Same for that chance Torres got and which he took wrongly. That's not something where a pre-season would have given a different result on. Just poorly taken.
Lol right back atcha. No need to be condescending if you disagree

Do you honestly believe we would’ve played a poorly as we did if we’d had a proper preseason? We created 2 clear cut chances, that’s nothing to do with not having a striker on the pitch. If we’d created plenty & they were all missed, I’d be agreeing that today’s game was compelling evidence that we need a striker. We didn’t, so it isn’t.

IMahrez & Torres missed those chances, but what makes you think a different player wouldn’t have missed when both are pretty impressive finishers?
 
Last edited:
I don’t understand the relevance.

You seem to be implying the deal’s already done.

I’m assuming there is still a gap on price.
The relevance is the Monday before Grealish signed people on here were wondering if he was going to sign a new contract with Villa yet the deal was agreed weeks ago.

If there was no deal in place Kane plays today it really is as simple as that.

If you want to believe Kane coincidently forgot to return to Spurs a week before he should have, took a week to say it was planned that way knowing he had to then isolate for a week meaning he only returned the day before the season starts that's fine. I'm sure you believed the Messi to PSG deal getting sorted in 2 days too
 
seems bit stupid to say we have no intention of letting him go......oh but if we did he would be £160 million ??
 
Didn’t do too badly without him today.
An obvious reply, and one you no doubt expected, but even so, I just couldn’t resist.
Haha aye, but it's the noise they are coming out with - get it done soon so a replacement can be bought. The narrative that we are prepared to wait until the end of the transfer window is bizarre - it suits neither team
 
Today have shown (besides not much of pre-season, like most of the others teams, under the same circumstances) that we need a striker foremost.
Finisher, left back and manager.

Not paying daft money for someone with 2 or 3 years left at the top though,
 
I am guessing that you agreed to lose as part of the deal.

Otherwise why would the second best team in Europe lose to a team that (according to you lot) is worse than Villa?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.