mrtwiceaseason
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 7,682
It doesn't it focuses their mind to either take £100m this season or £0 nextHow does that force them to terminate his current contract?
It doesn't it focuses their mind to either take £100m this season or £0 nextHow does that force them to terminate his current contract?
I think he signed a massive contract tye summer that they got to the Champions League Final. He obviously thought they were going places under Pochettino.If it was a problem for him surely he wouldn't keep signing long deals at Spurs, he could have ran his contract down anytime he wanted over the last 10 years
It seems to me it bothers other people way more that Harry Kane has won nothing, than Harry Kane himself.
I am sure he will take the plaudits for being the PLs highest goal scorer alongside being his country's record goal scorer.
I'm sure it will still be a good take to tell his grandkids from the front seat of his supercar or chair in his massive house with cinema and pool.
What a fucking failure lol
And I don't even like him btw and didn't want him at City.
But in Mahrez's case he eventually got his move and I am not sure it affected any bad feelings towards him from their fan base.
It’s the Webster ruling that clubs have a “gentleman’s agreement” not to use.Just spotted the edit. Don't know enough about that one but I have heard of it, so perhaps that is an actual legal route should he hypothetically really want out.
I broadly agree with you btw, Spurs aren't holding him hostage, he is there because he accepts being there. I just don't entirely agree with some of the claims thatnif he wanted out, he'd just have left. It is an uncomfortable stand-off, where both sides seem comfortable with a status quo.
It’s the Webster ruling that clubs have a “gentleman’s agreement” not to use.
So far, it’s worked, but at some point a club will use it and it might become more commonplace after that.