Harry Kane

[FantasyIreland]

**** of a bloke.

Belongs at the swamp,the ****.

 

[birchwoodgingerste]

Regardless of ability, he's practically unattainable.

Tottenham could be in administration and only the transfer of Kane could save them, and Levy would still charge £250m.

Agreed aint happening

 

[01cravend]

He'll probably end his career having scored the most goals in Prem history yet his trophy cabinet will be empty.

 

[Otamendi's Beard]

Won't happen but he'd score hatfuls with KDB supplying him.

 

[Trojan1962]

Prefer Haaland due to his age and potential

 

[waspish]

Well if Levy would take 100m I’d say yeah go for it if not tell him to fcuk off

 

[HelloCity]

**** of a bloke.

Belongs at the swamp,the ****.

You don’t seem to have the same attitude towards Grealish...

 

[FantasyIreland]

You don’t seem to have the same attitude towards Grealish...

Then you need to dig deeper.

 

[Rammy Blue]

It’d be funny watching how fast he went from the darling of English footy to being a pariah.

 

[Tokyo32]

If Tottenham don’t win anything this season he would most likely want to leave but I doubt Tottenham would want to sell except if Kane himself makes it known he wants to leave. I would love him at the club over haaland also

 

[nmc]

It’d be funny watching how fast he went from the darling of English footy to being a pariah.

How many weeks would he remain England Captain? 3 or 4 ?

 

[waspish]

How many weeks would he remain England Captain? 3 or 4 ?

He be Called out for a diver a cheat every game.

 

[AliBobbyJ]

Of all the short-term, short-sighted signings in history this'd be the shortest. 90 m. for two years of Kane vs. 150 m. for ten years of Haaland. It's not that difficult.

 

[nellyonthewing]

I might prefer Son.

 

[Goater=Legend]

He's 27. A bit of a **** but we'd dominate the league for the next few years with him and KDB

Don't see it happening though

 

[MaineDAWG2008]

He will leave summer unless they up his salary.

 

[richards30]

Top player no doubt but if we chucked braff into the deal on top of that figure we could probably get haaland?

 

[kun]

Prefer Haaland due to his age and potential

Me too but what if Haaland wants to play elsewhere?

 

[Sir Joe Aguero]

Me too but what if Haaland wants to play elsewhere?

We need to be at least in for him or Kane. Either would improve us massively. If they choose elsewhere, fair enough, but we need a big boy statement in attack. KDB feeding Kane or Haaland would be unfair.

Mbappe might be going Madrid or Liverpool, Kane must want trophies and Poch is at PSG, but Madrid have been linked previously. Obviously Haaland’s Dad played for us, so hopefully he wouldn’t want to go to the Rags. Juve could be in the mix but they’ve spent a ton on Ronaldo. Chelsea have just spent 300mil in a short frame of time so they’re probably dependent on top 4 before they make any big signings. Barca are skint and Haaland doesn’t seem like a Barca player. Munich could go for Haaland but Lewandowski has a few years left. There’s definitely room in the market for us to get one of the 3, with Haaland most likely and Mbappe the least, but we need to be decisive.

 

[Tokyo32]

Of all the short-term, short-sighted signings in history this'd be the shortest. 90 m. for two years of Kane vs. 150 m. for ten years of Haaland. It's not that difficult.

Stop it. That is not short sighted, kane is one of the best footballers and still has a lot to offer, he is not the quickest so he doesn’t rely on speed and he actually has a good football brain unlike a certain robot striker