Hiddink wants role as technical director
- Thread starter skybluekings
- Start date
dannybcity
Well-Known Member
Damocles said:
It's so crazy it could work.
Garry.Cook
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 1,812
Ricster said:
Yep, Cooke and Hughes are tight-knit. They won't let anyone else come in and disrupt their influence on the club.
skybluekings
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 1,234
kiam06 said:
Dare Hiddink say to the owners Hughes is not good enough ;)
I'm a bit intrigued about the whole football director thing, I can see a lot of logic in it but you'd probably need to look abroad for someone that doesn't see a football director as a direct blow to his ego.
Not sure that Hiddink as technical director and Hughes as manager really compliment each other, I'd rather see Hiddink in charge of match day decisions and coaching, and Hughes left to sign players.
Not sure that Hiddink as technical director and Hughes as manager really compliment each other, I'd rather see Hiddink in charge of match day decisions and coaching, and Hughes left to sign players.
bigcol
Well-Known Member
The way Guus came in at Chelsea and steered them to a decent season has to be admired. The question of that loyalty repeating seems distant. Guus would look at the City squad and drool. As for working alongside MH, interesting scenario. Both would have respect for each other and their collective egos appear benign. Personality has a way of sorting it out which in the intermediate term I feel positive. Bring Guus aboard for the ride of his life and put him on as tactic match selector with Hughes priming the squad. What a combination. Gets me all warm.
When we are 1 nil down and Hughe is pondering how the change things would we honestly prefer him to be asking mark bloody Bowen for advice or getting ideas off someone like Hiddink.
Could be a pefect role for both them, hiddink doesn't want the day to day stuff, maybe a couple of sessions a week on defedning as a unit ( remember how well he got south korea and austrailia defending with crap defenders)and an advisory role on match day as well as his influence with players current and prospective could be a real help to hughes in his first big role for a few years till he retires and hughes would be better equipped to go alone.
Could be a pefect role for both them, hiddink doesn't want the day to day stuff, maybe a couple of sessions a week on defedning as a unit ( remember how well he got south korea and austrailia defending with crap defenders)and an advisory role on match day as well as his influence with players current and prospective could be a real help to hughes in his first big role for a few years till he retires and hughes would be better equipped to go alone.
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
blightee said:
All of the above probably.
Hughes doesn't have to take it but he seems to take it as an afront to his position if any is given.