Centurions
Well-Known Member
Palmer, maybe. And that's it.I think the biggest mistake we made is letting so much of our youth go. Imagine how many of our youth we sold would be playing now
Palmer, maybe. And that's it.I think the biggest mistake we made is letting so much of our youth go. Imagine how many of our youth we sold would be playing now
The only issue I have with Palmer going is that a possible loan to a Premier league club might have been a better option but I don't think anyone would have envisaged Palmer having such a good first season with Chelsea.Palmer, maybe. And that's it.
McAtee is sat there and the lad is getting barely anything so that stops your argument straight away. Fact is, when you have an academy of extreme talents and your watching some of the best players in the world get signed every summer in the first team, you know you have little chance in making it.Lavia, Frimpong, Harwood Bellis, Palmer, Gittens, would have all got game time at City this season. Perhaps even Delap and Tosin. Not saying it was mistake to sell them all at a time when they needed to develop but it is certainly unfortunate.
All very true but it's a fine balance and you'll never get it 100% rightMcAtee is sat there and the lad is getting barely anything so that stops your argument straight away. Fact is, when you have an academy of extreme talents and your watching some of the best players in the world get signed every summer in the first team, you know you have little chance in making it.
All of those lads have gone onto top level teams, they aren't knocking around in League 2. Their ambition goes beyond just waiting around for the first team to have a mass injury crisis.
I thought the 2 year buy back was a reasonable idea. Also, I don’t imagine it meant we couldn’t go back after a year, we’d just have had to pay what the Chavs were willing to stump up, I suppose.The only issue I have with Palmer going is that a possible loan to a Premier league club might have been a better option but I don't think anyone would have envisaged Palmer having such a good first season with Chelsea.
The other one is Lavia. Don't understand the reasoning in putting a buy back clause in that only became effective after 24 months.
I suppose every player is different and have agents with different agendas. THB is a typical example where Southampton had a compulsory purchase clause only if they got promoted.
There's part off me thinking I'd nearly have preferred them not getting promoted and THB still being on our books. From THBs perspective it has worked out perfect for him, culminating in an England cap.
We could have bought him via buy back for £20m after 24 months.I thought the 2 year buy back was a reasonable idea. Also, I don’t imagine it meant we couldn’t go back after a year, we’d just have had to pay what the Chavs were willing to stump up, I suppose.
McAtee is sat there and the lad is getting barely anything so that stops your argument straight away. Fact is, when you have an academy of extreme talents and your watching some of the best players in the world get signed every summer in the first team, you know you have little chance in making it.
All of those lads have gone onto top level teams, they aren't knocking around in League 2. Their ambition goes beyond just waiting around for the first team to have a mass injury crisis.