leewill31 said:
ok so your thoughts are that the chairman made the team shit after a couple of months and it was not down to the manager to keep them in that position?
im all most positive that you said the other day that hughes is responsible for the teams performance but its differnt for sven?
like ive said look beyond the hate of that man and look at how sven was tactically inept to take us any further than he did.
You are either being deliberately thick or the whole substance of my point ( not to mention a great chunk of established history) has really gone over you head.
How well do think any manager anywhere could perform if the chairman had made it clear that he was a dead man walking whatever the results? And also that any or all of the players were up for sale at the end of the season regardless of how they performed?
The conditions were made impossible. Even Garry Cook has gone public on this! Everybody connected with City felt let down and undermined. The club was on the edge of ruin!
I'm sorry, but the dramatic downturn after December was not Sven's doing. That is completely obvious to anybody who cares to look.