You've made a theoretical argument of why Gundogan/Rodri combo is bad. If you check the last post on the pregame thread, it was mine making this very point.It is extremely problematic because we introduce 2 midfielders into a midfield 3 that are a mixed bag. When it was a Fern, KDB and Silva midfield it was easy to watch them and know what each of them brought to the midfield. We had far and away the best midfield in the country.
I am not convinced what Rodri excels at. He is fine when the ball is in and around his space (basically a 5 yard circle around him) but off the ball, not so much. He adds next to nothing to our attacks and lets face it, he is hardly ripping it up defensively.
Throw Gundogan in as well, you pretty much lose any ideas of pressing from the 8s and again he is not an attacking midfielder, or a defensive one. He is a 6 in this side, recycling possession and that is it.
If we are going to have 2 out of 3 midfielders that don’t particularly excel at either attacking or defending, we would be better off gong down the scouse route of putting legs in there.
While I theoretically agree with your point, it wasn't a significant issue today. We were missing chances and making poor decisions on the final pass.
What Rodri and Gundogan bring is consistent possesiob, and in that respect we were dominant. That possesiob makes it impossible for the opposition to get the ball or attack us.
So if you've wanted to know, that's what they bring. The problem is Bernado gives us similar with a better eye for attacking. Hence why I prefer him to tone of these.
But for today, it was finishing and final 3rd decision making that let us down. Not a possession heavy midfield.