squirtyflower
Well-Known Member
let's get this rightskybluekings said:Blue Mooner said:Yawn if you read the thread I think we've established that these 'facts' you talk about are dubious at best !
I'm sick to death of reading about this £200 million it's largely irrelevant for three reasons in my mind
I) This is virtually a completely new squad/team - I would argue that to build a new premiership team capable of challenging the top 4 (who have spent that and more over many years) is not as easy as some seem to want to believe - especially when a Ronaldo, Torres, Terry, Rooney et al would cost you £50 million plus
II) There is no benchmark of a team having been rebuilt from pretty much the ground up. Chelsea did it with a team that was already very much challenging.
III) We have paid more than some players 'true' worth in order to get players that teams didn't necessarily want or need to sell and in order to do it quickly - therefore a 'true' team valuation may be nearer 100-125 million
Anyone who can't see that we have much improved squad and team a much improved mentatlity and a generally higher level of performance just is simply incapable of remembering the boredam we had to endure under Pearce and Sven and total lack of consistency.
I think you have to include money in the argument because look at Real Madrid. They have spent even more than we have and they are 2nd in the league and Champions League Knock Out phase. They too have made many changes to their team and even have a new coach.
real madrid are second in the league that is perennially a two horse race, that means they are coming last?
next you'll be comparing us to rangers who are skint being top of the SPL
get a grip