whp.blue said:
However you miss the point that The Koran not only sanctions but advocates some of the actions of these Extremists
Perhaps people like to get caught up in semantics the bottom line is you find it hard to get away from the fact 1.6 Billion people on this planet follow a religion that actually advocates the actual persecution of non believers and if that wasn't enough this so called religion also denies 50% of the worlds population equal rights.
I find it hard to believe any sane person can defend the teachings of the Koran whether or not you get into the arguments about what should be classed as a moderate or extremist.
Defend the teachings of the Koran to your Daughter or your Mother.
But would you argue that any of the Abrahamic religions don't have pretty abhorrent text within it?
If not, then surely we must look further beyond simply the religious text?
There is a great deal of commonality between Islam and Christianity. They are both religious texts written an incredibly long-time ago, in a different world entirely. They both contain incredibly restrictive and prescriptive doctrine, they have both been tools to, historically, control and subjugate.
So surely there is something else at play, rather than it being just religious indoctrination?
I mean, quite frankly, its a book. Firstly, a book written by people, it doesn't have magical powers, its "strength" lies in its interpretation. Like with any religious material, there will be passages some people follow word-for-word, there will be some passages that people gloss over and ignore.
In the bible isn't there some guff about it being a sin to eat shellfish?
Anyway, taking the above into account, then there must be other factors to consider, surely?
In the case of religious extremism, barbarism, murder, etc. It will almost certainly fall under socio-demographic factors. What are themes that a number of middle eastern countries have in common? Poverty, lack of education, lack of resources, (etc.)
Barbarism isn't restricted to religion, but it is strongly correlated with the above. Take Mexico City. In recent years it has recorded higher murder counts than Afghanistan. Take MS13, want to have a bet on who has beheaded more people, them or ISIS? I don't know the true figures, it may well be ISIS. But I tell you what, I wouldn't bet my house upon the outcome without doing in depth research.
The simple, unavoidable, truth is that religious subordination weakens as a countries GDP grows, as its citizens come out of poverty, as its citizens gain education. We can look at some of the more developed Muslim countries. Dubai, UAE, etc. While they aren't exactly places I would like to make my home, they are more tolerant of different cultures than a number of muslim countries; it could even be argued they've come an incredibly long way, at an incredibly fast pace considering when they started their path of development.
As for UK born extremists. This is a different topic, but again, its probably no surprise that a lot of these people are those who found their extreme sense of relegion at a later stage in life. The murderers of Lee Rigby, Choudary himself, even the recent article on the BBC discussing female Jihadis - all "born again" to a certain extent.
This to me looks more like individuals who are disenfranchised, detached, lacking a sense of community. Although the current events are extreme examples, its probably not a hugely different mindset than those from the UK who supported the IRA, spied for Russia, etc.
I mean, although massively different even those who become football hooligans I think are testament to a certain section of society who lack identity and try to fill that void.
Anyway, just my opinion and the actions are of course abhorrent. I just don't think the solution is placing the emphasis on a book that, in its own right, can actually just be put down as an example of fiction.