You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Jadon Sancho
- Thread starter sam-caddick
- Start date
-
- Tags
- jadon sancho
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Did I read correctly that Spurs had offered £3m? Are we even entitled to a fee with him not signing a pro contract?
Be funny if he went for more than Nasri! Haha!
He's got a year left on his scholarship
Does that entitle us to a transfer fee?He's got a year left on his scholarship
Manchester1894
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2007
- Messages
- 6,360
Shouldn't have been called up for England. City twitter congratulated him.. at least we've been professional throughout this episode.
Read that he can't play for Spurs (or another side) without our permission/release.
I'd be tempted not to give it, hope to convince him back and if not we can't do any worse than what Spurs are offering at the tribunal.
City might hope that such sanction would act, in the short term, as a deterrent to others but it could prove to be counterproductive in the long run. It would put City in danger of gaining an unwanted reputation among top young English players as a place that they should avoid at all costs.
It's perfectly apparent that Sancho wants to move a) back to London and b) to a club where, in his opinion, he will get an earlier opportunity to play first team football. City might be able to reassure him about the latter (though I doubt it) but there's nothing that they can do about the former. So it seems highly unlikely that he could be persuaded to change his mind. It's also more than possible, after he went AWOL, that City no longer want anything further to do with him bar negotiating the fee and sell on percentage.
Hungarian blue
Well-Known Member
Will they do a Fryers on this too?
I mean if a player goes AWOL and doesnt respond to try force a move, cant turn around and expect us to be nice and just let him go which would reward that behaviour.
If he wants a move he can act like a professional, if a club submit a reasonable offer we agree to terminate it early or he can throw his toys out the pram and we hold him to his contract.
The last option is we try convince him to stay during this remaining year but seems bridges have already been burned. Shame as would liked to have seen him get a chance.
If he wants a move he can act like a professional, if a club submit a reasonable offer we agree to terminate it early or he can throw his toys out the pram and we hold him to his contract.
The last option is we try convince him to stay during this remaining year but seems bridges have already been burned. Shame as would liked to have seen him get a chance.
squirtyflower
Well-Known Member
A Spurs fan thinking he should move to Spurs, well I never!City might hope that such sanction would act, in the short term, as a deterrent to others but it could prove to be counterproductive in the long run. It would put City in danger of gaining an unwanted reputation among top young English players as a place that they should avoid at all costs.
It's perfectly apparent that Sancho wants to move a) back to London and b) to a club where, in his opinion, he will get an earlier opportunity to play first team football. City might be able to reassure him about the latter (though I doubt it) but there's nothing that they can do about the former. So it seems highly unlikely that he could be persuaded to change his mind. It's also more than possible, after he went AWOL, that City no longer want anything further to do with him bar negotiating the fee and sell on percentage.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.