Jamie Jackson’s Player Season Ratings — Do you agree?

I think Ake is a 9. I think there is some recency bias in Doku and Gvardiol - but given the crap they got all season and because I like them, I’ll take it. (And I suppose the recent part of the season is the most important in a way). I’m fine with 10s for Rodri and Foden because I think over the course of the season there is no one better.

Here were last seasons scores for references.

Ederson 9
Walker 8
Rico 9
Dias 9
Ake 9
Stones 10
Akanji 9
Gomez 6
Rodri 9.5
Phillips 5
Gundo 9
Silva 8
Haaland 10
KDB 10
Alvarez 9
Grealish 9
Foden 7
Ortega 8
 
I mean it’s only a bit of fun. I don’t think anyone is going to get worked up about it.

But when I think of a 10 back in the old days when a lot of people weren’t watching all the matches, it’s like the sort of thing you might see every 3 or 4 years. Something so exceptional, it would be reserved for a top player anyway having a career high performance.

Even 9, was very rare. I’d be looking more like a very satisfactory 7, rather than 9 for the likes of Doku and DeBruyne just because he missed half the season

But I suppose it’s nice to be over appreciated for once.
I think VAR needs to intervene.
 
Seems a bit generous in all honesty. Could knock a point off quite a few. Dont get me wrong the squad has been awsome, but a few of the nines should be seven or eight.
 
A more reasonable full season accounting, imho, based on ON FIELD PERFORMANCES when available, ignoring injuries, which can’t be helped.

Ederson - 8
Ortega - 8.5
Walker - 8
Lewis - 6
Stones - 8
Akanji - 8.5
Dias - 8
Aké - 8.5
Gvardiol - 9
Gómez - 5.5
Rodri - 10
Kovacic - 7.5
Nunes - 6
Phillips - n/a
De Bruyne - 9
Bernardo - 9
Grealish - 7.5
Foden - 10
Bobb - 6.5
Álvarez - 8
Doku - 7.5
Haaland - 9

Am only torn about Akanji and Ake, whom I could give 9, but I never quite felt we were safe at the back, yet they always seemed to play well!!
 
No interest in what that clown has to say. Won’t be clicking the link. Thanks anyway.

I'm giving Jamie Paradise a ZERO.

a4829a48-840d-4dd7-a128-d1b53ca952d1_text.gif
 
Nothing too outrageous but I'd adjust a lot of those by a point one way or the other. I also really despise how the 1-10 scale is effectively a 5-10 scale and predominately a 7-10 scale for most. Use the whole fucking scale with 5 being the median as it should be not 7. For that reason most of my rating would see players go down as I'm basing it on 5 being average and not an insult.

Ederson 9
Ortega 8
walker 7
stones 7
dias 7
Akanji 9
ake 9
Gvardiol 8
gomez
Lewis 6
Phillips 3
rodri 10
kovacic 7
nunes 5
Bernardo 8
kdb 8
Foden 10
Grealish 6
Bobb 6
Doku 8
Alvarez 7
haaland 9
 
It’s funny how we’re being more harsh than The Guardian.

We’re awesome. Let’s take the end of the season inflation.

If our players aren’t getting an end of season 8/9/10, who should?!?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.