Jermaine Jenas sacked by the BBC

So we’re forced to endure Elon Musk and GB News for our News outlets - no thanks.

The BBC provide an amazing service across all categories and have done for many years, one of the few institutions to be proud of.

No ones forced to pay for it.


You only have to endure people you don't like if you actively seek them out so you can get upset about them, why is it the same people triggered day after day after day.

The BBC want taking round the back and shooting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PPT
You only have to endure people you don't like if you actively seek them out so you can get upset about them, why is it the same people triggered day after day after day.

The BBC want taking round the back and shooting.

You seem to get ‘triggered’ by BBC. Don’t watch it.
 
You seem to get ‘triggered’ by BBC. Don’t watch it.


I don't, but there again I don't need to because the same people who love it post it on here. The same reason applies to GBnews, Twitter and any other form of emotional crutch some people use that they feel the need to share.

It's all here :)
 
So we’re forced to endure Elon Musk and GB News for our News outlets - no thanks.

The BBC provide an amazing service across all categories and have done for many years, one of the few institutions to be proud of.

No ones forced to pay for it.
It's worth the license fee just to watch the delightful Sophie Raworth read the news
 
I don't, but there again I don't need to because the same people who love it post it on here. The same reason applies to GBnews, Twitter and any other form of emotional crutch some people use that they feel the need to share.

It's all here :)

You seem to be wanting the conversation of the BBC to be dragged into this thread, calling for the destruction of it based on Jenas sending some naughty text messages.
 
You seem to be wanting the conversation of the BBC to be dragged into this thread, calling for the destruction of it based on Jenas sending some naughty text messages.

Just commenting on some of the nonsense posted on here, like the straw argument about the nonce ridden Catholic church used to validate the amount of wrong 'uns in the BBC.

I haven't commented that much on Jenus because we don't even know what he has done yet.
 
Agree it must be bad, but we still as yet don't know. Although not enough to be charged as yet?

Which begs the question if what he has done is that bad why hasn't he been charged?
Is sending a dick pic (that's an example not an accusation) a criminal offence if sending to an adult?
It can get you the sack for sexual harassment for sure.
 
Is sending a dick pic (that's an example not an accusation) a criminal offence if sending to an adult?

I'd say if it was unsolicited yes it is, if let's say that's what he has done isn't the BBC or some other part of the mechanism covering it up?

The point is we don't know what he has done.
 
Just commenting on some of the nonsense posted on here, like the straw argument about the nonce ridden Catholic church used to validate the amount of wrong 'uns in the BBC.

I haven't commented that much on Jenus because we don't even know what he has done yet.

Why is it a strawman? every organisation has wrong'uns- it isn't always a institutional issue as you desperately trying to make it to.
 
Why is it a strawman? every organisation has wrong'uns- it isn't always a institutional issue as you desperately trying to make it to.


You're not defending every other organisation, but you specifically mentioned the Catholic church which is the very definition of a strawman.

Strawman

The BBC are bad
So are the Catholic church.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top