Jermaine Jenas sacked by the BBC

BlueHammer85 said:
Why is it a strawman? every organisation has wrong'uns- it isn't always a institutional issue as you desperately trying to make it to.
Click to expand...
Freelance presenter breaks terms and conditions of his contract and has contract terminated.

If it is also illegal and the other party wishes to press charges, then the CPS will decide if there is a case for Jenas to answer.

The BBC come under fire for “protecting wrong’uns” but are now being criticised for not knowing in advance that Jenas was susceptible to sending inappropriate messages.

Seems as soon as their internal investigation was complete, he was sacked.

Pretty normal HR procedure.
 
mexico1970 said:
The BBC are bad
So are the Catholic church.
Click to expand...

I've made the point that every institution, especially ones that employ over 20,000 will have it's scandals. Not sure how that can even be debated.

Also made the point that Jenas has worked for Talksport, TNT, C4 so unsure how it's a BBC problem - when they are the ones to actually take action against his conduct.
 
BlueHammer85 said:
I've made the point that every institution, especially ones that employ over 20,000 will have it's scandals. Not sure how that can even be debated.

Also made the point that Jenas has worked for Talksport, TNT, C4 so unsure how it's a BBC problem.
Click to expand...

We weren't discussing other organisations though were we? It's like saying I think Ipswich are shit and you piping up with "So are Southampton".

It's a strawman.
 
mexico1970 said:
We weren't discussing other organisations though were we? It's like saying I think Ipswich are shit and you piping up with "So are Southampton".

It's a strawman.
Click to expand...

If someone from Ipswich sends a dick pic to the Ipswich tea lady there isn't huge discussion about whether they should fold as club.

It's pretty obvious someone from a 20,000+ organisation will do something wrong/illegal. That doesn't make it a institutional problem every time. Do you accept that?
 
BlueHammer85 said:
If someone from Ipswich sends a dick pic to the Ipswich tea lady there isn't huge discussion about whether they should fold as club.

It's pretty obvious someone from a 20,000+ organisation will do something wrong/illegal. That doesn't make it a institutional problem every time. Do you accept that?
Click to expand...

Fuck knows where your mind is but I am not enabling you and going there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PPT
The wum is spoiling another thread being contrary , boring now

As for jenas , he is now getting his lawyers to sue the beeb for how they handled the stuff he has done wrong , a few crocidile tears and deflecting like fuck , cheaters always deflect away
 
kaz7 said:
The wum is spoiling another thread being contrary , boring now

As for jenas , he is now getting his lawyers to sue the beeb for how they handled the stuff he has done wrong , a few crocidile tears and deflecting like fuck , cheaters always deflect away
Click to expand...
No he isn't. The frothing BBC haters have 'spoilt the thread.
 
mexico1970 said:
But he actually did type that, the Catholic church has wrong 'uns so don't point out that the BBC has wrong 'uns too. It's not that hard keep up.
Click to expand...

Many people are pointing out that there’s wrong’uns in every organisation/institutions when large numbers are involved - you bought up the BBC (once again) when this is a thread about Jenas (who also works for TNT/Talksport & C4) - all the BBC have done by the looks of it is take appropriate action, so what’s the issue?
 
BlueHammer85 said:
Many people are pointing out that there’s wrong’uns in every organisation/institution - you bought up the BBC (once again) when this is a thread about Jenas (who also works for TNT/Talksport & C4)
Click to expand...

But the news as is that he was hoofed from the BBC, I know you don't like people mentioning it but those are the facts.

We have had people saying it has to be serious, but not serious enough to be illegal even though sending unsolicited dick pics is illegal (If it was even that).

But you carry on defending them.
 
mexico1970 said:
We weren't discussing other organisations though were we? It's like saying I think Ipswich are shit and you piping up with "So are Southampton".

It's a strawman.
Click to expand...

I hate to get involved, but isn't it whataboutery, rather than a strawman?
 
mexico1970 said:
But the news as is that he was hoofed from the BBC, I know you don't like people mentioning it but those are the facts.

We have had people saying it has to be serious, but not serious enough to be illegal even though sending unsolicited dick pics is illegal (If it was even that).

But you carry on defending them.
Click to expand...

The BBC have taken the appropriate action by the looks of it - what have they done wrong here ?
 
bluenova said:
I hate to get involved, but isn't it whataboutery, rather than a strawman?
Click to expand...

Whataboutery is blaming the BBC for Jenas’s actions - did they force him to text a dick pic to a couple of their staff members? What exactly have the bbc done here?

Hes struggling to answer and just wants to bash the BBC once again at any opportunity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top