gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Ok, but the principle will be the same. Etihad’s commercial interests will (imo) be protected by any contract the club has with a broadcaster. Substitute the names and the rest of my post is the same.Beglin is not employed by BT Sports. He's employed by Premier League Productions who broadcast the game for international audiences. So a lot more people heard it as it wasn't on BT Sports
I’d be amazed if this didn’t represent a breach of the broadcaster’s contract with the PL and Beglin’s with the broadcaster. If Etihad hadn’t been brought into it I reckon the narrative would have been different.