Kamala Harris

KS55 said:
No answer of course. Why did you ask about Trump requesting the fake certificates when it is not relevant? Whether he asked or not makes no difference to a RICO indictment. Have you read Georgia’s statute and the indictment? A decent contrarian would know the relevant law. You don’t.
You’re a fake.
Click to expand...
I think you've conflated 2 discussions. I'm just making fun of domanilo
 
moomba said:
No concerns with Trump and democracy. He ha. Fucking hell.

Whether he wins or whether he loses I have huge concerns about the threat to US democracy from him and his culture.

And by the looks so do most of the people he worked with in his first term.

Not to mention my concerns about his racism, attitude to women, criminal past and present, declining mental state etc etc.
Click to expand...
There are a million reasons not to vote for Trump. A concern about threats to democracy simply isn't one of them.
 
The Future’s Blue! said:
I do wonder, troll, click-bait, or just fucking stoopid?
Click to expand...
Or actually believe what others find incredibly unbelievable. That’s always a possibility.
I have found I’m kind of giving up trying to debate or explain what I feel doesn’t need explaining. Everything goes round in circles and others in here occasionally say about various posters, don’t waste your time they are nothing more than trolls.

Maybe it’s me and how I view things but I don’t actually understand what anyone gets out of that.

What is the purpose or benefit of this manner of trolling to the individual. What can they possibly get from it?

I find myself increasingly scratching my head in the crossover posts between Israel America and the world in general. Some of the stuff is mind boggling and I wonder who are they trying to convince, themselves or us as a football forum.
 
KS55 said:
I’ve just realised, @Bigga does not understand what RICO means. If any person in the ring is convicted, ALL DEFENDANTS IN THE RING ARE GUILTY. So whether Trump asked it to be done is completely irrelevant. The prosecution do not need to show his personal involvement. Read the statute, dummy.
Click to expand...
Are you sure that is right?
I mean, if I was charged too, and Trump was convicted, I’m pretty sure I wasn’t involved.
Isn’t that the point of a trial with co-defendents - some might be guilty and some not?
 
GH64 said:
Are you sure that is right?
I mean, if I was charged too, and Trump was convicted, I’m pretty sure I wasn’t involved.
Isn’t that the point of a trial with co-defendents - some might be guilty and some not?
Click to expand...
No. It is the point of the Rico statute which was aimed at organised crime. Prosecutors were unable to say who exactly did what (partly due to Omertà.) so the legislation basically said “If you take part in an organised criminal enterprise, ALL indicted participants are equally guilty, if the jury finds (a) the actus reus took place and (b) one member of the enterprise is guilty—ie it was you lot!”
Whether they can make a Rico case stick in this case is not 100% clear, but half those indicted have pleaded guilty and co-operated with the prosecution. Their evidence may well convict Trump. Rico is a fearsome tool.
Google “Georgia Rico” and you will see that in almost the first para, it says that only one conviction is required. I had forgotten but it requires two actus reus to be proved, but that makes no difference in this case as multiple crimes are alleged.
Think of Rico as a wheel. The actus reus is at the hub and all in indictees are on the rim. The prosecution proves the hub and then moves on to the rim. Liability attaches to the rim; once one indictee is found guilty all those on the rim are equally guilty.
 
Last edited:
FogBlueInSanFran said:
Trump is rarely right whereas I usually, and in this case, am.
Click to expand...
He’s not right when he uses someone’s physical appearance to belittle them and although if you were to do it to me, I feel I know you enough to take it as banter and wouldn’t take offence, I’d just give as good as I get.

But there does seem to be genuine needle between yourself and a couple of our fellow trolls, sorry I meant blues, in here.

Blues. I meant blues.

Point being Foggy. Take a deep breath, think of Electric Lovers, think of your family or whatever puts your mind at peace and come at it again from a different angle.

Then again, why listen to a 5’ 2” gobshite like me.
 
mancity2012_eamo said:
He’s not right when he uses someone’s physical appearance to belittle them and although if you were to do it to me, I feel I know you enough to take it as banter and wouldn’t take offence, I’d just give as good as I get.

But there does seem to be genuine needle between yourself and a couple of our fellow trolls, sorry I meant blues, in here.

Blues. I meant blues.

Point being Foggy. Take a deep breath, think of Electric Lovers, think of your family or whatever puts your mind at peace and come at it again from a different angle.

Then again, why listen to a 5’ 2” gobshite like me.
Click to expand...
You are right. And I apologiz(s)e.

You have demonstrated thoughtfulness, curiosity, intellectual honesty and humility and humo(u)r, and added value. You are the last person I’d think of when it comes to playing internet tough boy, regardless of your height.

On the other hand, the fucking little boy parakeets who like to stir things up here and play-act at human conversations are more likely 8 inches tall, or whatever the height of the average budgie is.

And I’m enjoying our new record, btw. More than the last one, that’s for sure.
 
Last edited:
FogBlueInSanFran said:
Um — mate — you have demonstrated thoughtfulness, curiosity, intellectual honesty and humility and humo(u)r, and added value. You are the last person I’d think of when it comes to playing internet tough boy, regardless of your height.

On the other hand, the fucking little boy parakeets who like to stir things up here and play-act at human conversations are more likely 8 inches tall, or whatever the height of the average budgie is.
Click to expand...
I’m yanking your chain.
I’m 5’9” (still not great), but you get the jist of what I’m saying.
Deep breaths.
 
KS55 said:
I’ve just realised, @Bigga does not understand what RICO means. If any person in the ring is convicted, ALL DEFENDANTS IN THE RING ARE GUILTY. So whether Trump asked it to be done is completely irrelevant. The prosecution do not need to show his personal involvement. Read the statute, dummy.
Click to expand...

I think you're flattering him.. he doesn't understand anything except:

1727309706799.png
 
Gareth Barry Conlon said:
Kamala has talked about removing the filibuster to correct the Row scotus verdict.

I think she needs to go further and also correct presidential immunity.

And then go further and set up a scotus ethics review panel and discipline all the judges who were complicit in gifting Trump immunity that wasn't warranted. Setup term limits and remove the political appointment of judges.
Click to expand...
That’d set the cat amongst the pigeons, but I’m not saying it isn’t warranted!!

P.S. it’s Roe.
 
Bigga said:
The "interesting" line was sarcasm. Which you, obviously, don't understand.

I should spell things out in crayon, I think. Nice big letters for you.

You, CLEARLY, are ignoring the Dem Party ramping up actions in other countries, taking us to the brink of war. It's got FA to do with Trump as he's not in power and hasn't been for 4 years... and yet...

It's all his fault.

Not the current leadership who is stationing troops and weapons everywhere.

That's the 'disappearing trick' you conduct; the big issue right in front of your face!! It's pure ignorance at what is happening TODAY, not 4 years ago and not the fear mongering next year if Trump is in power.

You people are hell bent on war.
Click to expand...
I can see we are done here. Not interested in your petty bullshit and other nonsense anymore.

Always love a good “you people,” though!
Nice work!!!
 
Aphex said:
If you think that's more important than pandering to victim demographics to keep people believing they ARE victims then I pity you.
Click to expand...
Thanks. Now that I see your grudge, I also see the time I’m wasting. Are there any other tangents you’d like to toss out with your pity for me? HAHAHA!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top