cleavers
Moderator
There's already a tunnel the other side of the port 4 miles up river.Why don't the build a tunnel done seem that long a span
There's already a tunnel the other side of the port 4 miles up river.Why don't the build a tunnel done seem that long a span
"Can the ships' Captain please come to the bridge?"No shithole foreigners responsible, local pilots are used to navigate the ships in and out of the harbour
View attachment 111843
It was normal then. Don’t judge someone from yesterday based on today’s supposed moral standards.Re: Francis Scott Key, taken from Wikipedia,
At the time of his death he owned eight human beings. !!
No shithole foreigners responsible, local pilots are used to navigate the ships in and out of the harbour
View attachment 111843
Not sure the ships would be able to fit through it, mate.Why don't the build a tunnel done seem that long a span
I suppose we should be grateful that it wasn't nose to tail traffic on there when it happened.Thanks for that and they did have those protectors which proved completely inadequate.
They should in such a busy shipping channel had something far more substantial:
View attachment 111823
View attachment 111824
View attachment 111825
Yes, six hours later or earlier and it would have been.I suppose we should be grateful that it wasn't nose to tail traffic on there when it happened.
I'm wasn't judging anyone, unless you take a few exclamation marks as proof of that. I assume the bridge was named in honour of him for writing the words to star spangled banner, fair dos. But the real standout for me was that for somebody who led the american colonisation society, he still ended up 'owning' slaves when he died. Wasn't right then and it's not right now, I think we can agree on that moral standard.It was normal then. Don’t judge someone from yesterday based on today’s supposed moral standards.
And, that was clearly not why the bridge was named after him.
Yeah, it would have been going backwards.Genuinely think if Southgate was in control of this ship it wouldn't have happened.
Slavery has always been a part of the human story. I’m glad I live today, when it is decried and considered morally repugnant.I'm wasn't judging anyone, unless you take a few exclamation marks as proof of that. I assume the bridge was named in honour of him for writing the words to star spangled banner, fair dos. But the real standout for me was that for somebody who led the american colonisation society, he still ended up 'owning' slaves when he died. Wasn't right then and it's not right now, I think we can agree on that moral standard.
No; you can see that the weight of the debris resting on the bow has caused the ship to be slightly trimmed down by the head and listing to port. It's hard to tell definitively from the pictures, but it appears that most of the damage to the ship is above the waterline and ahead of the collision bulkhead. None of those things should have a significant effect on its stability.Is the weight of the structure resting on the front of an already fully laden ship a concern?
Will the fiends still be able to get to the low rises?Beyond the potential loss of life, that bridge is THE ONLY outer harbor bridge and will create massive headaches for Baltimore and those people attempting N-S travel. The reroute through or around Baltimore will be very problematic.
You can't get the big trucks in the tunnels plus certain goods being carried cant go in them eitherWhy don't the build a tunnel done seem that long a span
Sounds more like a company interested only in profit, unwilling to invest properly in ship maintenance, coupled with regulatory failure to force said company to comply with standards; that such a ship was allowed access to the harbor points to inadequate regulation allowing this catastrophe to occur in the first place. This isn't the first time that the ship which crashed into Key Bridge has been involved with mishap.Sounds like a very unfortunate set of circumstances if true.
It's At Lloyd's not with Lloyd'sLloyds names must be shitting themselves.
The ship, the containers, the port and the bridge all fully insured by Lloyd’s!
Baltimore bridge disaster likely to be ‘biggest marine insurance loss in history’
![]()
Latest news & breaking headlines
The latest breaking UK, US, world, business and sport news from The Times and The Sunday Times. Go beyond today's headlines with in-depth analysis and comment.www.thetimes.co.uk
They underwrite almost every insurance company ever anyway. This is why I always get the annual hump when it comes to renewing car insurance. They all serve the same ultimate boss anyway, its a game and a load of shitLloyds names must be shitting themselves.
The ship, the containers, the port and the bridge all fully insured by Lloyd’s!
Baltimore bridge disaster likely to be ‘biggest marine insurance loss in history’
![]()
Latest news & breaking headlines
The latest breaking UK, US, world, business and sport news from The Times and The Sunday Times. Go beyond today's headlines with in-depth analysis and comment.www.thetimes.co.uk