Judging from the title - "killing the game" - it's going to be very anti-City.
If I'm correct - and if you want to see what an anti-City viewpoint looks like - I guess you could read the book.
Otherwise - with respect to the book - not having read it - fuck off!
City has abided by the ridiculous supposed "FFP" rules - which were instead promulgated not to ensure financial parity (a dubious proposition in-and-of-itself) but to entrench established elite sides in the stratosphere of football hierarchey.
Sides with more resources - and especially with bigger fan bases - have every right to field elite teams.
Teams talented enough to compete with the elite from other leagues.
And to ensure that complacency doesn't creep in - financial rules need to allow the opportunity for newcomers to challenge the established elite.
===
Edit - who knows what the book's viewpoint actually is.
Reviews such as this:
https://www.thenational.ae/sport/fo...-decade-of-change-at-manchester-city-1.766473
paint the book as neutral in viewpoint.
Yet one questions the choice of title if the author is both:
1) gifted; and
2) neutral.
City fan or not - why would you be in favor of "killing the game" - lacking context of what that actually means? - as a book title - there's zero context.
===
Seems like a book title designed to spark interest in book sales - ill-suited towards a pro-City stance if that was indeed the author's intention.