I've read your post back to myself several times, wondering if I'm missing something. I can't figure out what your problem is with Leicester's sponsorship arrangements. Aren't we in the same position, the shirt and stadium sponsor being one and the same "company"? Leicester's are, at least nominally, different companies. If you can clarify what your problem is, that'd be great.why is Leicester allowed to use King Power on there shirt and naming right ?
The people that own King Power are the same people that own Leicester .
Anyone that has any more info on this
Do you have an opinion on The City, Solskjaer, Potchitino conspiracy theory ?why is Leicester allowed to use King Power on there shirt and naming right ?
The people that own King Power are the same people that own Leicester .
Anyone that has any more info on this
ok in english. The advert on Leicester City shirt and the name on there football ground is King Power.
The people that own King Power are the same people that own Leicester is that not forbitten in FFP rule ?
'Kin white powder.
And? Aren't we in exactly the same position? And, as far as I am aware, we've never had an issue on that front with FFP.ok in english. The advert on Leicester City shirt and the name on there football ground is King Power.
The people that own King Power are the same people that own Leicester is that not forbitten in FFP rule ?
And? Aren't we in exactly the same position? And, as far as I am aware, we've never had an issue on that front with FFP.
Thank youEtihad aren't owned by ADUG.
He seems to be complaining about the shirt and stadium sponsor being effectively the same. If he isn't, fine. But that's how it reads. And, looking at some of the replies, I don't think I'm the only one reading it the same way.Etihad aren't owned by ADUG.