Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Transfer forum' started by taleofbluehalves, 15 Apr 2018.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz again zzzzzzzzzz ..... oh wait.. paint drying..
One thing is for certain, if Mbappe came, he would want to be off again in 2 years, He is being wagged by the tail.
Run away then, but think why this thread is currently active
No because we would have to sell a good player to fund it and be within spending rules and he seems to want to be on kev type money and that won't happen,the sooner people realise that the only player we would have done that for is Messi the better,pep has also said won't buy 100m players,why can't people grasp that we have a carefully balanced pay structure,pep has also said the squad harmony is why we don't go outside the pay structure,we keep our best players and add players who we see value in to improve the squad and not just one player who would cost more than we value him at and wanting big wages like sanchez etc,that is city and why we have the best in the business running us
He's going to leave PSG in the not to distant future and why wouldn't we be in the running to sign him?
No sense in talking about it in this transfer window if he isn't leaving in this transfer window.
I disagree with pretty much everything you just said, but fair enough. I've also seen zero evidence at all to suggest we would have to sell before buying to stay within spending limits.
Putting the pedantic semantics and extreme theoretical hypotheticals aside, does anyone really truly think this is likely to happen? Highly doubt it. Ultimately, the guy aint coming to City, while he is under contract at least.
So you just don't believe at all that we were in for him two years ago, despite him talking about it? Because that’s how much he would’ve cost then and we were prepared to spend it.