PannickAtTheDisco
Well-Known Member
Just to let him and Stockley know we know he's on our game after this:
We'll be watching with interest...I'm sure the club will be too.
We'll be watching with interest...I'm sure the club will be too.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Leicester v Man City - VAR (David Coote)
- Thread starter PannickAtTheDisco
- Start date
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
The VAR team should be immediately replaced after that this afternoon as to allow the another game in the same day is simply asking for trouble as they look to make amends.
PannickAtTheDisco
Well-Known Member
The VAR team should be immediately replaced after that this afternoon as to allow the another game in the same day is simply asking for trouble as they look to make amends.
I just hope he doesn't Pannick.
Gorton_Tubster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 14,809
- Location
- Riding the blue tidal wave.
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I said it before, Leicester are going to kick us all over the park and nothing will be done about it.
MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
With a less senior onfield ref though.
jimharri
Moderator
We got a break with the KDB "no handball" decision. It could well have been awarded. The penalty we got was a definite penalty though.
For all the good it did us!
For all the good it did us!
simon23
Well-Known Member
We got a break with the KDB "no handball" decision. It could well have been awarded. The penalty we got was a definite penalty though.
For all the good it did us!
would have been very harsh...his arms/hands were in at his body and protecting his face..he was also turning away from the ball.
I think even though i can see why ours was awarded i also tink it was a bit harsh - correct call as far as the rules about the defender knows nothing about it.
Thaksinssoldier
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 10,013
would have been very harsh...his arms/hands were in at his body and protecting his face..he was also turning away from the ball.
I think even though i can see why ours was awarded i also tink it was a bit harsh - correct call as far as the rules about the defender knows nothing about it.
It could easily have been given...Jim is right tbh.
Millwallawayveteran1988
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Sep 2010
- Messages
- 37,010
would have been very harsh...his arms/hands were in at his body and protecting his face..he was also turning away from the ball.
I think even though i can see why ours was awarded i also tink it was a bit harsh - correct call as far as the rules about the defender knows nothing about it.
Are you allowed to just put your hands up in case it hits your face?