Carragher said that we didn't win the league but Liverpool lost it, then went on to heap loads of criticism on City.
Why didn't he analyse why Liverpool have never won the PL and why they failed to win it at our expense, absolute twat who can't even speak coherently.
He's spot on though.
There are question marks over the mentality of this side and both our PL title winning seasons have done nothing to dispel that.
Hart, Kompany, Yaya, Silva and Aguero is arguably the best core of players to ever grace the PL. Whilst Arsenal, United and Chelsea have also had some world class core of players, I think that ours would give them a run for their money. But one thing that separates us from those brilliant sides is the ruthless mentality they had.
Chelsea, United, Arsenal and even fucking Leicester have all walked the league title. I mean Leicester sealed the title weeks ago and have won by 10 points. We have never managed that feat and our PL wins have been on the final day.
Whilst I think it's a little bit lazy to simply say that United and Liverpool threw the league away in our title winning seasons. Though there is an undeniable truth in the fact that they both had the league in their hands and lost it. We were deserved winners and capitalised on their mistakes.
Yet this comes to the crux of what I think Carragher was trying to say. We seem to perform better as the underdogs and winning against the odds. Typical City we call it but the fact is that this squad of players should have walked PL titles in a manner that Leicester have this season.
At the start of this season we looked like a dominating, all conquering side who looked capable of anything. We then added one of the best playmakers in the world in KDB and one of the best CBs in La Liga. Yet we lacked the ability to win the league.
This cycle over the last 5 seasons has been brilliant. 2 PL titles, 1 FA cup and 2 league cups is a very good return. But as the cycle comes to an end, I still believe and always will that this group of players did not reach their potential. To say they have underachieved would be extremely harsh and wrong but they had the ability to achieve so much more.
This IMO is why Pep Guardiola is the game changer. We need to learn to adapt to being under pressure and trying to dominate on all fronts. With all due respect to Mancini and Pellegrini, neither of their CVs suggest that they could do that. Now Pep on the other hand is a whole different animal and the fact that he has managed to thrive under the pressure of managing two European giants and win an insane amount of trophies in the process is exciting.