Centurions
Well-Known Member
Is that monetising or commemorating though? Just because AIG's name is on it doesn't mean any money changed hands. I think you're stretching there.Seems to me that it's tragedy sponsored by AIG. Is it not?
Is that monetising or commemorating though? Just because AIG's name is on it doesn't mean any money changed hands. I think you're stretching there.Seems to me that it's tragedy sponsored by AIG. Is it not?
It's not illegal to sing 'always the victims' its not North korea.It's not illegal to boo a national anthem. We don't live in North Korea
Also it's about the busby babes not the tragedy itselfIs that monetising or commemorating though? Just because AIG's name is on it doesn't mean any money changed hands. I think you're stretching there.
I haven't said it isIt's not illegal to sign 'always the victims' its not North korea.
It might not be illegal (nobody claimed it was so that's nonsense straight off) but it is unnecessary at least. I'm sure someone can come up with better chants that can't be claimed to be linked to tragedies.It's not illegal to sign 'always the victims' its not North korea.
Not once have I suggested it should be forgotten about. I agree there is a media bias towards Liverpool in general but I think that is more to do with the fact that pundits/presenters have been disproportionately ex Liverpool players or fans.
And a lot of Italian fans also aren't alive.. due to the fucking murdering Scouse cuntsAlso a lot of the Liverpool fans it's being chanted at weren't even alive when it happened
You sound lovelyAnd a lot of Italian fans also aren't alive.. due to the fucking murdering Scouse cunts
It was for the 50th anniversary of the tragedy, so of course it was about that.Also it's about the busby babes not the tragedy itself
Also it's about the busby babes not the tragedy itself