Liverpool loses...

Surely most tourists who would go there go either for A/The Beatles history B/It's football teams C/ stags or hens, I have never heard of anyone going to Liverpool because its UNESCO heritage site
None of the above. Most go there to purchase kilo quantities of its plentiful supply of heroin and cocaine for onward distribution through the UK
 
Some nice buildings but ffs it should not be on any UNESCO List. Go beyond the front and there are still places that haven't been touched in 40 years. I like the place as well. Fuck the Beatles off aswell. The Hollies were are better Band.
The whole Unesco thing was a joke anyway. To lump Liverpool in alongside such iconic sites as the Taj Mahal is laughable.
To then use Everton as an excuse is ridiculous. The area where the stadium will be built is almost derelict, out of the main Dock area and will create employment also.
It's the only worthwhile development that has happened in the city for years and unlike the intentional decline of another football stadium area in the city.
 
Some nice buildings but ffs it should not be on any UNESCO List. Go beyond the front and there are still places that haven't been touched in 40 years. I like the place as well. Fuck the Beatles off aswell. The Hollies were are better Band.
Liverpool often lauded for its popular music but its rep is all based on the Beatles. A cursory glance will show that Mcr musical heritage is far superior.
 
Come on, A Flock of Seagulls and Our Kid walk all over anything Manchester has produced.. And don't forget Cilla....

Yeah! We gave the world this!....

200.gif
giphy.gif

BronzeQuestionableEnglishsetter-max-1mb.gif
ObeseGraveAlleycat-size_restricted.gif
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.