Liverpool thread 2018/19

[Barcon]

A dipper work colleague of mine who I have been with today, is convinced that it's still the coutinho money !!! I thought they got 140 million for him not 140 billion !! If we lose overnight he is gonna be a nightmare tmrw . But it goes to show that an intelligent guy who is a well rounded football fan can be taken in by the propaganda that is put out about spending in football . As far as he is concerned. City are just a filthy oil rich club that can buy who they want and at any cost , he doesn't understand that we have to abide by the same rules as everybody else .
So today we established that this season he doesn't want to hear about "buying the league" or " American sugar daddies" As Liverpool are doing it the correct way ie. Using their own money raised by buying and selling players and genuine cash flows and not being funded by petrodollars, and Herr Klopp is not a hypocrite in any shape or form he was obviously misquoted when he gave that statement .
BUT he did concede that this is a shit or bust season for the dippers and that something has to be won, and if not then they are going to find it very difficult to compete in the future , the only thing he said all day I agreed with !!!

This intelligence, well rounded guy might just as well have called us filthy sand niggers.
He's a racist **** mate. Don't be fooled.

 

[lonestay]

Barcon he really isn't , but city's perception is still that of a club that is propped up by a very rich benefactor.
He can't get his head around that the dippers are in the same situation .

 

[Barcon]

Barcon he really isn't , but city's perception is still that of a club that is propped up by a very rich benefactor.
He can't get his head around that the dippers are in the same situation .

"Filthy oil club", "filthy oil money" are just terms for "filthy Arabs". Chelsea's oil money doesn't seem to be filthy.
He may be educated but he seems far from intelligent mate.

 

[journolud]

The scouse narrative for the coming season (which means it's the media narrative) is that we can be "got at" just like Liverpool did last season. So we're going to be "got at" by more clubs, which means we'll get less points, 85-90, which narrows the gap between us and the dippers to around 10 points based on last season. Liverpool have strengthened and a 10 point gap can be closed...Hey Presto!...It's their year!

Most teams if they try to "get at" us won't have the ability to pull it off and we will pick them off. Liverpool are one of the few who will manage it. I don't expect much change from the parked buses

 

[willipp]

"Filthy oil club", "filthy oil money" are just terms for "filthy Arabs". Chelsea's oil money doesn't seem to be filthy.
He may be educated but he seems far from intelligent mate.

And what they really mean is filthy Muslims.

 

[Vienna_70]

They'll be out to hammer our young ens tonight. Anybody know what channel it's on?

Scouse bastards' TV.

 

[JPBB]

Really don’t understand the whole net spend argument, it’s just an excuse for failure which Liverpool are well accustomed to. It’s like arsenal fans bragging about having cash in the bank, no one cares and makes it all the funnier when you fail year after year.

We spend what we want on the basis of a sound financial model now, net spend doesn’t come into it other than the overall impact to our accounts, of which transfers are just one part.

I think the net spend argument works for some clubs clubs that do not have money for whatever reason. Burnley simply can not risk mortgaging their future on big name players. They know it could all go to shit in a season and then would be fucked (like Villa and Leeds). Spurs are committed to a neutral-ish net spend because their lenders insist on it. Arsenal want to build value for their shareholders.

Liverpool's neutral net spend is not the same. They want to be big spenders. Their problem is their players don't want to be part of that madhouse. They are reluctantly net neutral. They are not there by choice. They are wishing they could be City. And failing. In short, they are a bit pathetic.

 

[Cellarite]

Scouse bastards' TV.

The BBC are showing it?!?

 

[Gazza]

13 years.

United... spit... Have won the league 13 times since these scouse twunts last won it, even Leicester and Blackburn have won it in the meantime

 

[Marvin]

I think the net spend argument works for some clubs clubs that do not have money for whatever reason. Burnley simply can not risk mortgaging their future on big name players. They know it could all go to shit in a season and then would be fucked (like Villa and Leeds). Spurs are committed to a neutral-ish net spend because their lenders insist on it. Arsenal want to build value for their shareholders.

Liverpool's neutral net spend is not the same. They want to be big spenders. Their problem is their players don't want to be part of that madhouse. They are reluctantly net neutral. They are not there by choice. They are wishing they could be City. And failing. In short, they are a bit pathetic.

I don't follow your argument. They have spent £180m net this Summer. You could have used that argument 12 months ago, you can't use it now.