Indaparkside
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2015
- Messages
- 14,863
From RAWK's City thread;
This in relation to The Times reporting that Liverpool have lost income because of City offering cheaper sponsorship.
Liverpool are convinced that they have lost out on several commercial opportunities because City accepted a lower offer from the same companies.
RAWK
That's interesting as it is the type of anti competitive behaviour that could lead to a Competition and Markets Authority investigation, as well as the football related probes.
Remind me, now did the authorities bring down Capone?
and
Shit houses I hope they get all their titles stripped off them.
and
It's because of these c*nts I now completely avoid flying Etihad out of Manchester, rather give my money to other airlines even though they're much dearer. Glad they're in financial trouble and wouldn't care if they went bust.
and
They are preventing us earning the money we need to finance the squad, wages, ground development by undercutting our deals then grossly inflating deals like the Etihad one to cover the lost revenue. For the exposure they are now getting and thus the exposure the sponsors get, they should be asking for deals on a par with what we get, not massively reducing them - it is just another way of stacking the deck in their favour.
But they don't ever even think about us!
Never, ever!
Hee Hee
Always the Victims