nobody can eat fifty eggs
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Sep 2011
- Messages
- 4,677
Fuck sake I'll post the link again on Smith:Damocles said:without a dream said:Damocles said:In terms of Thatcher "covering up paedophiles" are we just talking about Cyril Smith here or are there others that there is any factual data to support?
Because not only did she not cover up the Cyril Smith thing, the documents released shown that she almost certainly had no knowledge of it at all.
Link?
She was told about Police investigations into him and that knighting him risked damaging the honours process. That's just the stuff that was eventually released with other files being withheld on 'national security' grounds.
Linked above in a post that I was writing, but the thrust of it is that she was informed that there had been a Police investigation into it and no impropriety was found. It was written off because it was centered on spanking rather than the more gruesome penetrative sex that I'm sure would have been a big red flag. As silly as this sounds in 2015, many people at the time thought that spanking children's bare bottoms was perfectly acceptable and that's all this was - a rather innocent form of punishment. They were wrong of course as the allegations in the 2000s show but making that judgement call in the 1980s with just that as the primary source of knowledge isn't exactly a fair statement to say that "she knew all about Cyril Smith's paedophilia".
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/Politics/article1528436.ece" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/new ... 528436.ece</a>