Mahrez or Zaha...choose one

[BimboBob]

Zaha. He's a team player, younger, puts a shift in and actually tracks back. Mahrez, although gifted, is not a team player, gets brushed off the ball far too easily sometimes and drifts in and out of games. Zaha's best years are ahead of him, especially with us, Mahrez is around his peak now.

But it's down to Pep and history has shown he like Mahrez.

 

[Rolee]

Suuuure! :-)

He has 3 years, preferably next year, to make some City history. No time for players like Zaha...headless chickens! We already have one of them! ;)

Is this a wind up?

 

[ChicagoBlue]

Is this a wind up?

Nope.

 

[Rolee]

Nope.

I could've sworn he just rewrote the record books in English top flight football, must've dreamt it.

 

[Important Pellegrini]

Mahrez, although gifted, is not a team player, gets brushed off the ball far too easily

He should learn from Hazard how to fall over from a slight contact.

Mahrez is better than Zaha, Sterling, Sane, B. Silva.

 

[BimboBob]

He should learn from Hazard how to fall over from a slight contact.

Mahrez is better than Zaha, Sterling, Sane, B. Silva.

Excellent.

Are your other 20 posts as insightful and wrong like this one?

 

[Important Pellegrini]

Aww sorry. Zaha, Sterling, Sane, Silva, all are better than Mahrez.

 

[Blue Coop]

I think Mahrez would be dynamite in a team that sees lots of the ball. His stats for a Leicester side that don’t see much of it are crazy. Maybe concerns that the system would see him operate in lots of space to much smaller, but his style on viewings seems to cope with that.

He’s also very effective from that right at coming both inside and out to score and create. Which affords Sterling more opportunity to play through the middle and avoid having to buy a ST for mega bucks.

Mahrez all day.

 

[wagonman]

Mahrez...

He never played for "them".


JJ

 

[mancity2012_eamo]

Mahrez is better than Zaha, Sterling, Sane, B. Silva.
Aww sorry. Zaha, Sterling, Sane, Silva, all are better than Mahrez.

confused.com