Agreed. And not in the least bit weird calling them out. I thought Zinchenko was particular undeserving tbf. Gave the ball away with some sloppy passes, had his usual random shot off target and ducked out of the way rather than clearing a dangerous ball. He gets a 5 at best.Bit weird to be calling out two random votes for Zinchenko.
In any given match there are plenty of players given a few votes, even when completely undeserved.
Happily!I think you should review the poll again. Zinchenko has only half the votes that Stones has.
You might query that one?
I didn't have a bag over my head so saw Zinchenko have a solid game. Two mistakes at the 55minute mark but apart from that his passing, distribution and overall game was spot on.Agreed. And not in the least bit weird calling them out. I thought Zinchenko was particular undeserving tbf. Gave the ball away with some sloppy passes, had his usual random shot off target and ducked out of the way rather than clearing a dangerous ball. He gets a 5 at best.
Happily!
I thought he was meh as usual.I didn't have a bag over my head so saw Zinchenko have a solid game. Two mistakes at the 55minute mark but apart from that his passing, distribution and overall game was spot on.
No need to imagine. It's viewable on the poll.I thought he was meh as usual.
Anyway, would you agree he was not MOTM? I would imagine that's a yes. I swear to god some people must either be completely blind or just put random votes in as a wind up. Same goes for the people who voted for Stones. It must be an absolute first that being responsible for a goal conceded in 20 seconds, followed by bringing your team down to 10 min in the first 40 minutes, qualifies for a MOTM vote.
Someone from Duracell will be busy on Sunday inserting the A4's into Bernie, Phil, Gundog and Dino.Foden all day long with special mentions for Gundog and our very own Duracell bunny, Bernie.