Manchester City will show what sort of club they are by how.

Blueroses

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 Apr 2012
Messages
1,012
piece from Oliver Holt in the mirror..

--------------------------------
Stick or twisted? Manchester City will show what sort of club they are by how they treat Mancini
------------------------------------
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-city-show-what-sort-1846546" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... rt-1846546</a>?

Sacking a manager for coming second after delivering a first title in 44 years? Is that the club that will show itself in the next few weeks?

We will learn a lot about Manchester City in the next few weeks.

Nothing to do with whether they beat Wigan to win the FA Cup Final next month.

And only a little to do with how they perform in their remaining league games.

No, what it will tell us about them is whether they keep faith with Roberto Mancini, who won them a first league title for 44 years last season.

Do they back a manager who won the league one year and looks like finishing second in it the next?

Do they back a manager who will have won trophies in each of the last three seasons if City triumph at Wembley on May 11?

Or do they treat Mancini like Chelsea treated Carlo Ancelotti and fire him for the sin of once coming second?

After the FA Cup semi-final win over Chelsea eight days ago, many City fans were keen to emphasise their ­allegiance to Mancini. His name was sung loudly by those who travelled to White Hart Lane yesterday.

Certainly, some voiced disquiet after City succumbed to a barrage of three goals in less than seven minutes and slumped to a 3-1 defeat.

That Manchester United can reclaim their title tonight at home to Aston Villa is bound to unsettle some.

But City have always sought to distance themselves from the kind of knee-jerk decisions that typified Chelsea’s attitude to their managers.

And if they were to dismiss Mancini next month, they would undermine their commitment to stability. He deserves to stay. This season is a disappointment for City but hardly a humiliation.

And, particularly towards the end of the campaign, they have showed just what a fine side they are. For more than 70 minutes yesterday, they dominated this game. They looked a class above Spurs.

Carlos Tevez was unmarkable in attack, Yaya Toure was the king of midfield and Matija Nastasic was majestic at the heart of defence.

Presuming they listen to Mancini and strengthen again in the summer, there is no reason why they should not regain the crown next season. No reason why they should not reach the later stages of the ­Champions League.

United beating City to sign Robin van Persie decided the title this time. “It’s useless now to talk about the past,” Mancini said yesterday when asked about the striker.

“Now we have a time when there are good players on the market. We need to improve our team, but this is normal.

“We will also work on our mistakes because we made some.”

Mancini grew a little tetchy when asked what City could do to close the gap on United.

“We don’t have a gap,” he said. “The last two or three years, every time we have played United we have played better.

‘‘We can win the FA Cup and finish second. If that’s not enough, then all the other managers should be sacked as well.”

It is hard to argue with that, or with his reaction when asked if he would explain City’s season to the club ­hierarchy. “I shall explain nothing,” he replied.
 
Blueroses said:
piece from Oliver Holt in the mirror..

--------------------------------
Stick or twisted? Manchester City will show what sort of club they are by how they treat Mancini
------------------------------------
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-city-show-what-sort-1846546" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... rt-1846546</a>?

Sacking a manager for coming second after delivering a first title in 44 years? Is that the club that will show itself in the next few weeks?

We will learn a lot about Manchester City in the next few weeks.

Nothing to do with whether they beat Wigan to win the FA Cup Final next month.

And only a little to do with how they perform in their remaining league games.

No, what it will tell us about them is whether they keep faith with Roberto Mancini, who won them a first league title for 44 years last season.

Do they back a manager who won the league one year and looks like finishing second in it the next?

Do they back a manager who will have won trophies in each of the last three seasons if City triumph at Wembley on May 11?

Or do they treat Mancini like Chelsea treated Carlo Ancelotti and fire him for the sin of once coming second?

After the FA Cup semi-final win over Chelsea eight days ago, many City fans were keen to emphasise their ­allegiance to Mancini. His name was sung loudly by those who travelled to White Hart Lane yesterday.

Certainly, some voiced disquiet after City succumbed to a barrage of three goals in less than seven minutes and slumped to a 3-1 defeat.

That Manchester United can reclaim their title tonight at home to Aston Villa is bound to unsettle some.

But City have always sought to distance themselves from the kind of knee-jerk decisions that typified Chelsea’s attitude to their managers.

And if they were to dismiss Mancini next month, they would undermine their commitment to stability. He deserves to stay. This season is a disappointment for City but hardly a humiliation.

And, particularly towards the end of the campaign, they have showed just what a fine side they are. For more than 70 minutes yesterday, they dominated this game. They looked a class above Spurs.

Carlos Tevez was unmarkable in attack, Yaya Toure was the king of midfield and Matija Nastasic was majestic at the heart of defence.

Presuming they listen to Mancini and strengthen again in the summer, there is no reason why they should not regain the crown next season. No reason why they should not reach the later stages of the ­Champions League.

United beating City to sign Robin van Persie decided the title this time. “It’s useless now to talk about the past,” Mancini said yesterday when asked about the striker.

“Now we have a time when there are good players on the market. We need to improve our team, but this is normal.

“We will also work on our mistakes because we made some.”

Mancini grew a little tetchy when asked what City could do to close the gap on United.

“We don’t have a gap,” he said. “The last two or three years, every time we have played United we have played better.

‘‘We can win the FA Cup and finish second. If that’s not enough, then all the other managers should be sacked as well.”

It is hard to argue with that, or with his reaction when asked if he would explain City’s season to the club ­hierarchy. “I shall explain nothing,” he replied.

"But City have always sought to distance themselves from the kind of knee-jerk decisions that typified Chelsea’s attitude to their managers".





Try telling this to some on here..
 
And this is why our owners will not sack Mancini..

We are not Chelsea Mancini will get at least another year..
 
Cracks me up when journalists write articles like this, considering they are the only ones beating the drum to get him sacked
 
For me we must stick by the manager.

Its the many under performing, average players in our squad who should be fearing for their futures
 
waspish said:
And this is why our owners will not sack Mancini..

We are not Chelsea Mancini will get at least another year..

Give him the players he wants then lets see..We would have walked the title this year if his transfer targets would have materialised.
 
samharris said:
waspish said:
And this is why our owners will not sack Mancini..

We are not Chelsea Mancini will get at least another year..

Give him the players he wants then lets see..We would have walked the title this year if his transfer targets would have materialised.

I think we would of won the title if it wasn't for injuries to key players also stats show we have made the same amount of chances as last season but our finishing has been dire..
 
I felt sick when Carlo was sacked by Roman abromavich for coming second and even more so when he sacked Di Matteo for winning the champions league ad fa cup which pretty much showed the ruthlessness of the owner. In business sometimes you have to be ruthless and there are no sentiments if you want to be successful and with the new director in place they
would want to bring in their own choice coming in and with all the rumours flying around and the club not making any comment suggests something is up and Mancini hasn't helped himself either ( poor management, out of title race in feb/march,abysmal European showing...)

If mancini wins the fa cup and is sacked it will bring a lot of bad publicity with the timing but one that can not be leveled at us that he was not given time.

Time will tell, one thing I don't want is for us to turn into chelsea football club. At least the manager deserves another year but on the other hand if it was time to start rebuilding and make changes then this summer is the time due to ffp implications etc.<br /><br />-- Mon Apr 22, 2013 8:44 am --<br /><br />
samharris said:
waspish said:
And this is why our owners will not sack Mancini..

We are not Chelsea Mancini will get at least another year..

Give him the players he wants then lets see..We would have walked the title this year if his transfer targets would have materialised.

The media are hyping this up a bit and want mancini to be sacked as it will set us back a bit, furthermore, we have not improved our squad properly with only Nastatic the only one being a success and finishing success shows how much the signing mancini wanted would have really pushed us on forward. We are second in the league but the attitude of the players have to be questioned really and it not all mancini's fault...
 
Whilst I'm not surprised that Holt can't handle anything complex, the situation isn't even remotely that simple. There are plenty of scenarios in which Mancini leaving the club is best for all and doesn't automatically brand us the next Chelsea.

Not to mention he will, and everyone else like him for that matter, take the position that allows him to act the most outraged.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.