You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Mancini/Pellegrini rumours (10/05/13) (cont)
- Thread starter QuickSilva
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
OB1
Well-Known Member
Re: Manchester City close on Pellegrini (merged)
No I don't bet.
By going odds on, how are the bookies going to generate bets, are they trying to push people into the lengthening odds on other people?
Or are they trying to encourage people to think backing MP is free money?
fbloke said:Do you gamble at all?
I ask because if you do you will likely understand that bookies play the mug punter like a cheap fiddle.
If you want to 'convince' a bloke with no info to part with his cash simply create movement in the market even if no money has been placed and bobs your uncle a few pillocks will jump on in the hope of catching a bit of the action.
Lets also not forget that SkyBet are actively promoting that market right now which would generate further revenue. Are they doing that because they know Mancini is safe and every penny wagered is profit ro because they like to pay out?
You decide.
No I don't bet.
By going odds on, how are the bookies going to generate bets, are they trying to push people into the lengthening odds on other people?
Or are they trying to encourage people to think backing MP is free money?
Skashion
Well-Known Member
Re: Manchester City close on Pellegrini (merged)
Well, my money's going on Chelsea winning the title next year.
Well, my money's going on Chelsea winning the title next year.
OB1
Well-Known Member
Re: Manchester City close on Pellegrini (merged)
What I do know is that there was a significant change in the odds on David Moyes last weekend...
What I do know is that there was a significant change in the odds on David Moyes last weekend...
W
W
worsleyweb
Guest
Re: Manchester City close on Pellegrini (merged)
Glad I took it at 9 to 1!
Glad I took it at 9 to 1!
SuperSilva
Well-Known Member
Re: Manchester City close on Pellegrini (merged)
how much did you put on?worsleyweb said:Glad I took it at 9 to 1!
W
W
worsleyweb
Guest
Re: Manchester City close on Pellegrini (merged)
200
200
OB1
Well-Known Member
Re: Manchester City close on Pellegrini (merged)
Course it does.
Bob resigns.
MP comes is as safe pair of hands for a few seasons.
Pep rocks up at Etihad when his contract in Munich expires.
bluesoup said:Just don't get this Pellegrini stuff. When you think rationally it makes no sense ... I'm sure we'll find out soon enough !
Course it does.
Bob resigns.
MP comes is as safe pair of hands for a few seasons.
Pep rocks up at Etihad when his contract in Munich expires.
rastus
Well-Known Member
Re: Manchester City close on Pellegrini (merged)
Id rather put £5 on Mourinho at 16/1, bit like the grand national haha
As you say, If you put £300 on at 1/3 you win a £100 not bad, but you are encouraged to put on a bigger stake for a reasonable return, giving that the odds are almost a sure thing.OB1 said:fbloke said:Do you gamble at all?
I ask because if you do you will likely understand that bookies play the mug punter like a cheap fiddle.
If you want to 'convince' a bloke with no info to part with his cash simply create movement in the market even if no money has been placed and bobs your uncle a few pillocks will jump on in the hope of catching a bit of the action.
Lets also not forget that SkyBet are actively promoting that market right now which would generate further revenue. Are they doing that because they know Mancini is safe and every penny wagered is profit ro because they like to pay out?
You decide.
No I don't bet.
By going odds on, how are the bookies going to generate bets, are they trying to push people into the lengthening odds on other people?
Or are they trying to encourage people to think backing MP is free money?
Id rather put £5 on Mourinho at 16/1, bit like the grand national haha
- Status
- Not open for further replies.