tolmie's hairdoo
Well-Known Member
r.soleofsalford said:tolmie's hairdoo said:When the players knew Mancini was out, they were able to ease off.
Now some of our players know their time is up, they again lack the required level of intensity and motivation.
The by-product of that is the manager suffers the fall-out.
We are seeing the tail-wind of a variety of transfer regimes, from Hughes right through to Txiki/Pellegrini.
It's a patchwork quilt of those who shined, those who whined, those who thrived, and those who should never have been.
Pellegrini is the biggest and most unfortunate recipient of all that.
The only cure can be a clear decisiveness.
An acknowledge of the faults of everyone, and yet an emotional detachment, regardless of what has gone before, in terms of moving forward as a team for the next few years.
That goes for Yaya, Silva, Kompany, whoever.
It's a judgement call that can only be made by the 'informed'
I'm uncomfortable that one man in Txiki, football man or not, seemingly being the absolute overlord over whether a City team is successful or not.
He either trusts Pellegrini with the keys to the vault, or a dismissal HAS TO BE MADE.
His team selections and insistence on 442 isnt down to the players. Nice bloke that he seems, his constant playing of a 442 against teams that flood their central area`s to win is the root of all his and our problems. We get away with this most of the time because the individual quality we have on pitch, dig us out of a hole of Pelligrini`s making. His team selections have been nothing short of shambolic.
I travel with a supporters branch to both home and aways and have lost count of the times groans have rung out on hearing Pelligrini`s team selections. I`m sure anybody whole travels in a large group will back this up, it cant just be our branch
I`m also not happy with the messiah Txiki`s transer business since joining our club either, although to some extent his spending has been hampered by ffp which of course it was designed and evolved to do.
Pellegrini won two trophies in his first season playing 442, so you can perhaps possibly make a case that he has firm evidence of its success.
He continually stresses the word trust in his player.
Whilst him picking 442 isn't down the players, those same players can't suddenly throw their hands up in the air and state it's a flawed system, when Pellegrini can just point them in the direction of the medals in their back pocket.
My assessment is Pellegrini trusts a little too much and it is some of the players, whether down to fitness, age or being disgruntled, who have downgraded the effectiveness of a 442.
For me, systems are just another convenient caveat when things don't work out the way you want them to in competitive sport.
It will always be about desire, intensity and application. 442 against Leicester, 442 against United, the only difference can be all of those attributes.
45,000 against Stoke, 45,000 against United, what is the vast difference between the two atmospheres?
It simply comes down to it mattering all the more and people being up for it.
Quite obviously, you also need to recognise the shortcomings of your personnel, and apply them accordingly.
My view is the manager has been hanging on, pretty much like our supporters, that things would eventually turn for the better, based on what has gone before.