Massive Chemtrail activity today.

[JoeMercer'sWay]

Not really noticed, but an increase in colds and influenza is open to so many variables, such as age, physical health, immune systems etc.

Just to get this right

You are now saying that aircraft are spraying "stuff" in the air that will makes us ill and induce us to buy their products?

Varying degrees of Manipulation, do i need to spellout the last ten pages to you? Farmers/crops/ and yes, WE ARE BEING POISONED for various Agenda manipulation. Now gudnight, Milkfloats await.

you've been going for the last 2-3 pages...

 

[Lucky13]

These two should be on this thread.


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9KV4ESQ8HU[/youtube]

 

[Josh Blue]

Commercial Aircraft? maybe they aint commercial aircraft hey? maybe the pilots are told that it's to aide the environment? maybe pilot shut the fuk up and collect your coin at the end of the week, you know, placements puppets from the R.A.F and the like. Maybe your official line is a yarn, how many times has the human race been lied to? if if if if.......... as i said earlier, stick to your theory and be nice, and i'll do the same.

PS, so not one of my links has an ounce of truth in them? and if as you say they do, it does'nt matter as it was the cold war? haha, THEY HAVE LIED TO US RIGHT THE WAY THROUGH HISTORY.

The problem I see with chemtrails, is that it leaves three unanswered questions:

1. Why are they spraying us?
2. Who are they?
3. How is it possible to keep, control and organise a global conspiracy and pretty much keep it under wraps?

Buzzer, everybody lies to everybody throughout history. Since the beginning of modern society, the government's job is purely to be electable again in several years. Some achieve this by actually doing stuff that their people want. With the advent of the modern media though, most now just do whatever they want and tell the people that they have done what they asked.

Again though, I don't understand what somebody is trying to achieve with this?

Fair enough you can dimiss it, I understand there are Contrails but the theory of Chemtrails? I have seen no facts for me to dimiss it, also be care what science you read alot can be scientific theories not scientific facts. Remember the fact the world was flat and you were nuts to think it was round. Learn from history but each to their own, your opinion is just as valuable as mine, think everyones been abit rude to buzzer though.

Everything you have just posted is wrong. These are the problems (seems as so I'm in a numbered list mood):

1. Scientific theory has a very precise meaning, and doesn't mean the same as theory, or guess. The Moon revolving around the Earth is a theory. So is gravity. So is the Sun providing light by burning fuel. This is a fundamental thing that people need to understand about the scientific method.
2. There is almost no such thing as a scientific fact. The very, very tiny ones that are facts are things that are too obvious to mention, and mainly centre around causality.
3. Any piece of scientific literature that you read has sections whereby the researchers must provide a list of conflict of interests. You know who has sponsored the research that you are reading.
4. Scientific theories are formulated through the peer review process. This means that the experiment as laid out has to be replicated by numerous other, yet completely unrelated, people. Only if it passes the judgement of all of them is it seen as fit for publication.
5. Nobody ever thought that the world was flat.
6. Opinions aren't always as valuable as each other. I'm a computer programmer with a particular speciality in network security and operating systems design. The opinion of my 8 year old nephew on the architecture of the microkernel isn't as valuable as my opinion on it as I've studied them for several years and actually know what a microkernel is. Expanding this out for a bit, the opinion of a layman who has done next to no research on a topic is never as valuable as the opinion of an expert on it.

Fair enough, you're obviously a smart bloke but I still disagree with you.

 

[Cheesy]

For those who think contains are a recent phenomenon there's plenty of pics to be found of WW2 aircraft producing them. These are from propeller driven aircraft too & there's some great pics that show a pattern produced by the prop blades.

 

[GStar]

WTF are you on mate. i was merely asking BMrs if they had suffered in any of the above viruses, can you seriously seriously not see that. People have said on the whole that they have indeed been affected of late more than before, ffs mercer, please.

what am I on about? Well I've given a perfectly, legitimate, logical and reasonable explanation to your OP and asked a guy who's blabbering on about people telling him stuff as evidence for his ramblings why he's suddenly changed tack from saying loads of people have confirmed what he believes to trying to justify it by asking a small sample of internet forum users if they agree with him, which I only guess will end up with "see, I told you so".

but the last line is just a hunch.

Nah, you just misinterpreted i think... if buzzer said "X,Y and Z have told me they're had an increase in infections etc" then that means nothing to you or me, if people on here were to say they'd noticed an increase, then its a bit more substantial.<br /><br />-- 10 Apr 2011, 21:42 --<br /><br />

Fair enough, you're obviously a smart bloke but I still disagree with you.

For what reasons inparticular?

 

[JoeMercer'sWay]

what am I on about? Well I've given a perfectly, legitimate, logical and reasonable explanation to your OP and asked a guy who's blabbering on about people telling him stuff as evidence for his ramblings why he's suddenly changed tack from saying loads of people have confirmed what he believes to trying to justify it by asking a small sample of internet forum users if they agree with him, which I only guess will end up with "see, I told you so".

but the last line is just a hunch.

Nah, you just misinterpreted i think... if buzzer said "X,Y and Z have told me they're had an increase in infections etc" then that means nothing to you or me, if people on here were to say they'd noticed an increase, then its a bit more substantial.

-- 10 Apr 2011, 21:42 --

Fair enough, you're obviously a smart bloke but I still disagree with you.

For what reasons inparticular?

sorry it's just the same insignificant "odd person" who says it, it isn't substantial and concrete evidence that that is occurring.

The fact he went from "lots of people" to asking on the forum instead of "here's the stats and proper evidence" says it all to me, along with the "oh my goooodd"...

 

[BoyBlue_1985]

You know buzzer its quite hard to have a conversation with someone who trots out another FACT and then says bye or good night. You wouldnt do it if i was having a conversation with you face to face. You dont have to be rude because we have differing opinions

 

[Josh Blue]

Gstar, howcome you have taken interest in my disagreement with Damocles?

 

[tueartsboots]

Gstar, howcome you have taken interest in my disagreement with Damocles?

Mod woman war ! ;)

 

[GStar]

Gstar, howcome you have taken interest in my disagreement with Damocles?

Just interested as to why you disagree with him; he trotted out with a massive post and you just said; yea i still disagree. Be interesting to know why... given what Dam said.<br /><br />-- 10 Apr 2011, 22:02 --<br /><br />

sorry it's just the same insignificant "odd person" who says it, it isn't substantial and concrete evidence that that is occurring.

The fact he went from "lots of people" to asking on the forum instead of "here's the stats and proper evidence" says it all to me, along with the "oh my goooodd"...

Yes, but surely like i just said, if buzzer had said "all my mates say the same thing, they're getting more colds etc" - then your response "i don't know you're mates so that means fuck all to me"

He's asked to see if the board also follows suit, not changing track at all... there's never been any stats in this thread from buzzer.