Massive Chemtrail activity today.

GStar said:
Josh Blue said:
Gstar, howcome you have taken interest in my disagreement with Damocles?

Just interested as to why you disagree with him; he trotted out with a massive post and you just said; yea i still disagree. Be interesting to know why... given what Dam said.

-- 10 Apr 2011, 22:02 --

JoeMercer'sWay said:
sorry it's just the same insignificant "odd person" who says it, it isn't substantial and concrete evidence that that is occurring.

The fact he went from "lots of people" to asking on the forum instead of "here's the stats and proper evidence" says it all to me, along with the "oh my goooodd"...

Yes, but surely like i just said, if buzzer had said "all my mates say the same thing, they're getting more colds etc" - then your response "i don't know you're mates so that means fuck all to me"

He's asked to see if the board also follows suit, not changing track at all... there's never been any stats in this thread from buzzer.

which says it all...and he didn't say mates as far as i'm aware, he was generalising to people in general ie. the general population.
 
JoeMercer'sWay said:
GStar said:
Just interested as to why you disagree with him; he trotted out with a massive post and you just said; yea i still disagree. Be interesting to know why... given what Dam said.

-- 10 Apr 2011, 22:02 --



Yes, but surely like i just said, if buzzer had said "all my mates say the same thing, they're getting more colds etc" - then your response "i don't know you're mates so that means fuck all to me"

He's asked to see if the board also follows suit, not changing track at all... there's never been any stats in this thread from buzzer.

which says it all...and he didn't say mates as far as i'm aware, he was generalising to people in general ie. the general population.

Right... so he's asked BM to confirm what he's already said... how exactly is that changing his track?
 
GStar said:
JoeMercer'sWay said:
which says it all...and he didn't say mates as far as i'm aware, he was generalising to people in general ie. the general population.

Right... so he's asked BM to confirm what he's already said... how exactly is that changing his track?

"Erm, erm, erm, erm, let me see now. Heres one for you. Do you think that you or people that you know have far more colds/flu/sore throats etc? you do not know what you are breathing in as you cannot see it(obviously), so hence more people needing remedies ie beachams etc, therefor theat means Pennys, lots of lovely pennys, not to mention population control.

I suggest that you dig a little for yourself, look at the vids out there just like i have posted on this thread, LOOK FOR YOURSELF AND STOP BEING A FOLLOWER."

really big outlandish statement which you'd think would be said with some sort of concrete evidence or stats, to...asking a couple of people on an internet forum whether they've been poorly recently to show that he's right because he gets backing...
 
I really don't see why you're putting those two statements together.

The first is the premise to the conspiracy theory, the second, as i've now said three times is going back to trying to confirm that statement with a smaller section of society on bm. (Plus big outlandish statements are rrely if ever backed up with fact, that's why they're outlandish)

Conspiracy theories will rarely have concrete evidence, that's the whole point; it's a possibility, but it's hard to prove.

I don;t agree with buzzer on this one at all, but he's been consistent and it made perfect sense to me for him to ask for BM's opinion, to (try) and reinforce his point
 
GStar said:
I really don't see why you're putting those two statements together.

The first is the premise to the conspiracy theory, the second, as i've now said three times is going back to trying to confirm that statement with a smaller section of society on bm. (Plus big outlandish statements are rrely if ever backed up with fact, that's why they're outlandish)

Conspiracy theories will rarely have concrete evidence, that's the whole point; it's a possibility, but it's hard to prove.

I don;t agree with buzzer on this one at all, but he's been consistent and it made perfect sense to me for him to ask for BM's opinion, to (try) and reinforce his point

it doesn't to me, just proves he's spouting what he can't back up.
 
That's exactly what a conspiracy theory is.

Just because you can't back something up, doesn't mean it's automatically bollocks... although in this case, people like Bugs know what they're talking about and can give a decent account on the other side of the fence.
 
GStar said:
That's exactly what a conspiracy theory is.

Just because you can't back something up, doesn't mean it's automatically bollocks... although in this case, people like Bugs know what they're talking about and can give a decent account on the other side of the fence.

i don't see where you think he's been consistent still.
 
Fuck me, I've just wasted the last ten minutes of my weekend reading this.

Bollocks.
 
I read the whole thread now and there hasn't been any factual evidence for Chem trails really. I could make a youtube video tomorrow and i think i could get someone to believe it.

The only bit of evidence that planes dump stuff would be the plan fuel dumping; can that make people ill? I don't know but that's about all i've seen other than the reports from the 60's. I can't tell if they are true or not some bloke apparently knows about them and has made a video about them; is there any direct links to the reports? Plus that is from 50 years ago from when we had a very curious world.

As for Buzzer asking about whether people get more flu than normal i could answer that with a yes, i am at the moment getting more colds than i used to but there are so many reasons why that could be the case.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.