Theo555 said:Handed in a transfer request according to SSN
We were, apparantly, in for him once - better than Sinclair?
Rammy Blue said:Hard to say, saw him rip Micah apart at Molineux the other year, yet I've seen him do fuck all as well in games.
Neither good enough really for City but if it's a case of "cheap English player for bench/squad" then prob not much between them both.
Disagree. Jarvis' delivery as head and shoulders above that of Sinclair. Good left foot, good right foot, decent acceleration to get that yard needed to put a ball in. Sinclair's got the pace but his delivery is poor imo.Matt.D said:He's shite. Don't rate sinclair that much but he's definitely better than Jarvis.
Joehannes said:Disagree. Jarvis' delivery as head and shoulders above that of Sinclair. Good left foot, good right foot, decent acceleration to get that yard needed to put a ball in. Sinclair's got the pace but his delivery is poor imo.Matt.D said:He's shite. Don't rate sinclair that much but he's definitely better than Jarvis.
Blu KB said:Dont think there is much room for improvement in Jarvis' game, but he has good ability, can get dangerous balls into the box but there isnt any point in us being interested in him if we keep hold of Johnson.
Sinclair is capable of becoming a better player than Jarvis and will probably be the cheaper option.
brummie blue said:Had one good season two years ago and an England cap, was crap last season. Can't believe we'd be interested, not the quality we need.
brummie blue said:Had one good season two years ago and an England cap, was crap last season. Can't believe we'd be interested, not the quality we need.