Matt Jarvis

Theo555

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 Sep 2008
Messages
3,074
Handed in a transfer request according to SSN

We were, apparantly, in for him once - better than Sinclair?
 
Hard to say, saw him rip Micah apart at Molineux the other year, yet I've seen him do fuck all as well in games.

Neither good enough really for City but if it's a case of "cheap English player for bench/squad" then prob not much between them both.
 
Rammy Blue said:
Hard to say, saw him rip Micah apart at Molineux the other year, yet I've seen him do fuck all as well in games.

Neither good enough really for City but if it's a case of "cheap English player for bench/squad" then prob not much between them both.

This, although to judge from yesterday, we ain't gonna buy either unless we can shift some of Hughesless's shithead signings first
 
He's shite. Don't rate sinclair that much but he's definitely better than Jarvis.
 
Matt.D said:
He's shite. Don't rate sinclair that much but he's definitely better than Jarvis.
Disagree. Jarvis' delivery as head and shoulders above that of Sinclair. Good left foot, good right foot, decent acceleration to get that yard needed to put a ball in. Sinclair's got the pace but his delivery is poor imo.
 
Joehannes said:
Matt.D said:
He's shite. Don't rate sinclair that much but he's definitely better than Jarvis.
Disagree. Jarvis' delivery as head and shoulders above that of Sinclair. Good left foot, good right foot, decent acceleration to get that yard needed to put a ball in. Sinclair's got the pace but his delivery is poor imo.

He hasn't got that blistering speed so you might as well keep AJ
 
Dont think there is much room for improvement in Jarvis' game, but he has good ability, can get dangerous balls into the box but there isnt any point in us being interested in him if we keep hold of Johnson.

Sinclair is capable of becoming a better player than Jarvis and will probably be the cheaper option.
 
Blu KB said:
Dont think there is much room for improvement in Jarvis' game, but he has good ability, can get dangerous balls into the box but there isnt any point in us being interested in him if we keep hold of Johnson.

Sinclair is capable of becoming a better player than Jarvis and will probably be the cheaper option.

Agree with this
 
Had one good season two years ago and an England cap, was crap last season. Can't believe we'd be interested, not the quality we need.
 
brummie blue said:
Had one good season two years ago and an England cap, was crap last season. Can't believe we'd be interested, not the quality we need.

Correct - desperation setting in on here.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top