They will have the same chance.....not a great one. Every year, an age group squad of players 'become available' to every team, most are loaned/sold or released.I doubt that, I think some will go down giving more of a chance to youth.
I.e. If you join our Academy here at Crewe as opposed to City you’ll stand more chance of playing for the first team.
I know a kid got released from City and straight away loads of other clubs where interested as he had City training.
I don't know why we are selling him.didn’t he have another loan year left anyways? So why are we selling him if he is going to be worth 40+ next year? Or is it because of the stuff we going to do this summer? Even reis cost more and he is from Brazil.
didn’t he have another loan year left anyways? So why are we selling him if he is going to be worth 40+ next year? Or is it because of the stuff we going to do this summer? Even reis cost more and he is from Brazil.
We might need to free up some of our 6 international loan spots to have options for new possible outgoing loans...I don't know why we are selling him.
Just let him continue on with his loan at Como.
Yes now the time to think we’ve overpaid for a 19 year old new in the country when he’s hardly played . The sensible will probably give it a year or two.We definitely overpaid on Reis.
Viana really pushed it by all accounts as he was heading to Real Madrid. We had to blow them out the water to get him.
Or five.Yes now the time to think we’ve overpaid for a 19 year old new in the country when he’s hardly played . The sensible will probably give it a year or two.
If fabregas leaves in summer, which is likely, he might not play under the new manager then we'd be getting £3m for him the year afterI don't know why we are selling him.
Just let him continue on with his loan at Como.
He is a talent but sometimes players don't want to stay. We can say that they are not patient, and they can say that they don't believe they will get the chance. Either way, he wanted to stay at Como and they wanted him.Good money. But i think we've underestimated the talent. Im not sure Gonzo is any better. And yet we paid 50 million for him and Nunez each. When we had an 11 million player who was q
a better fit.
And folks cant say we didn't know. He showed more than enough in his cameo that he was a great fit.
But hey, we are here now.
Palmer the obvious one. Delap we sold for £15m, he's about to be snapped up for double and that's considered a bargain. Pedro porro we sold for £8m to have spurs buy him 12 months later for 40. Frimpong is potentially going to the dippers for 40. Lavia was sold for £15m and Chelsea bought him 12 months later for 40. Villa got £42m for Douglas luiz after buying him for about 12 from us.Sorry, but that just makes me laugh. Who are all of these players we've sold "too cheap"?
But, as is often said here, these are players we let go before they had the chance. Delap is 30m because he is now an established PL player, as are the others.Palmer the obvious one. Delap we sold for £15m, he's about to be snapped up for double and that's considered a bargain. Pedro porro we sold for £8m to have spurs buy him 12 months later for 40. Frimpong is potentially going to the dippers for 40. Lavia was sold for £15m and Chelsea bought him 12 months later for 40. Villa got £42m for Douglas luiz after buying him for about 12 from us.
It's not simply about the difference in sales figures though, it's relative to what the same money gets elsewhere. If we're buying perrone this summer from como rather than selling him, are we getting him for £25m? We paid more for a kid that's played 18 professional games, that's not a knock on him, just an indication of the market.
We're best in class for a lot of things behind the scenes. Getting maximum value from youth sales is an area we can and should improve on.
and all those fees come with sell-ons and have a good 5-10 million, coming on the next move etc. Usually equates for the kicker in price for the next club, you want him, you cover Citys % then or fuck off.But, as is often said here, these are players we let go before they had the chance. Delap is 30m because he is now an established PL player, as are the others.
I don't deny that. I'm not one for saying play all the kids, typically top clubs can't bring through academy players for fun and win things, we have to sacrifice a few kids for trophies and I'm fully on board with that.But, as is often said here, these are players we let go before they had the chance. Delap is 30m because he is now an established PL player, as are the others.
Not a single team in world football is better than us at selling youth players.We're best in class for a lot of things behind the scenes. Getting maximum value from youth sales is an area we can and should improve on.
Palmer the obvious one. Delap we sold for £15m, he's about to be snapped up for double and that's considered a bargain. Pedro porro we sold for £8m to have spurs buy him 12 months later for 40. Frimpong is potentially going to the dippers for 40. Lavia was sold for £15m and Chelsea bought him 12 months later for 40. Villa got £42m for Douglas luiz after buying him for about 12 from us.
Bcoz we sign players with potential and then sale for some other players who put a big dent in form of wages and amortisation
Phillips Gundo Bernardo with high wages and less output taking up places while their alleged replacements or sales are rocking it up elsewhere
Thats true but we know Perrone has had a very good season and several clubs are interested in him.And there is a chance not a single one of them would have developed into the players that warranted those fees if they didn't move in the first place
Which answers your question of why we're selling him nowThats true but we know Perrone has had a very good season and several clubs are interested in him.
He has been called up to the Argentinian senior team albeit for 2 friendlies
We had agreed a 2 year loan with Como for him and I see no reason why we shouldn't follow that up.
The worst that can happen is that he has a stinker of a season and his value drops.