Media coverage 2018/19

Status
Not open for further replies.
Liverpool Echo;

'Any fans attending the game last night and suffered injuries from flying objects from the City end, please forward compensation application to Manchester City Football Club'

Claimants so far: 245,000
That's just unique claimants, the total applications are at 25m or so.
 
Sportsday on the BBC early evening news looked at the next 6 fixtures of the top 3 and came out with "Liverpool look to have the easier fixtures until the derby with Manchester United". WTF?
 
As a journalist of many years it disgusts and depresses me in equal measure.
Tbf Daniel Storey (second article) is a blue and makes no attempt to hide it when covering us, he's also freelance and writes for a number of publications/sites, so I doubt there's any editorial pressure on him there.
 
Tbf Daniel Storey (second article) is a blue and makes no attempt to hide it when covering us, he's also freelance and writes for a number of publications/sites, so I doubt there's any editorial pressure on him there.
Storey is a big Forest fan & he has never hidden that when he use to write for F365 & on the numerous podcasts he’s on these days. Always gives us a favourable write up.
 
Storey is a big Forest fan & he has never hidden that when he use to write for F365 & on the numerous podcasts he’s on these days. Always gives us a favourable write up.
Always thought he was a blue from his articles, definitely has a soft spot for us anyway :) still writes for F365, just as a freelancer.
 
Tbf Daniel Storey (second article) is a blue and makes no attempt to hide it when covering us, he's also freelance and writes for a number of publications/sites, so I doubt there's any editorial pressure on him there.

Maybe so. My issue is that the first article is appallingly written and complete bollocks. It isn’t biased or written from a different viewpoint, it’s a total fabrication.

What is the point of writing a report of a match if it doesn’t in any way reflect the event itself? Why not just go a step further and say Liverpool won the match if that’s what people want to hear?

He’s a charlatan and would do exceptionally well in North Korea.
 
Maybe so. My issue is that the first article is appallingly written and complete bollocks. It isn’t biased or written from a different viewpoint, it’s a total fabrication.

What is the point of writing a report of a match if it doesn’t in any way reflect the event itself? Why not just go a step further and say Liverpool won the match?

He’s a charlatan and would do exceptionally well in North Korea.
Keeps the dippers happy, they're not big fans of reality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top